2026 Rankings

ZIP Codes with Most EPA Violations in Minnesota — 2026

Last updated: August 31, 2026

251 ZIP codes ranked by Recorded EPA Violations #1: ZIP 55076 (Inver Grove Heights, MN) - 36

Out of 251 ZIP codes with data in Minnesota, these are the highest-ranked areas for recorded epa violations. See also: National ZIP Codes with Most EPA Water Violations | All Minnesota Rankings

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 251
Highest value 36
Median value 2
State Minnesota

Top 100 Worst ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Recorded EPA Violations Safety Score
1 55076 Inver Grove Heights MN 36
2 56028 Elysian MN 28
3 56096 Waterville MN 28
4 55075 South Saint Paul MN 26 47/100
5 55077 Inver Grove Heights MN 26 64/100
6 55118 Saint Paul MN 26
7 56017 Cleveland MN 24
8 56057 Le Center MN 24
9 56063 Madison Lake MN 24
10 55042 Lake Elmo MN 16 49/100
11 55767 Moose Lake MN 13
12 55110 Saint Paul MN 11 44/100
13 55109 Saint Paul MN 10 47/100
14 55117 Saint Paul MN 10 63/100
15 55113 Saint Paul MN 9 64/100
16 55119 Saint Paul MN 9 64/100
17 55125 Saint Paul MN 9 47/100
18 55128 Saint Paul MN 9 64/100
19 55101 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
20 55102 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
21 55103 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
22 55104 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
23 55105 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
24 55106 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
25 55107 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
26 55108 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
27 55114 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
28 55116 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
29 55120 Saint Paul MN 8
30 55130 Saint Paul MN 8 64/100
31 55150 Mendota MN 8
32 55155 Saint Paul MN 8
33 55734 Eveleth MN 8 83/100
34 55751 Iron MN 8
35 55731 Ely MN 7 81/100
36 55362 Monticello MN 6 64/100
37 55746 Hibbing MN 6 80/100
38 56278 Ortonville MN 6
39 56751 Roseau MN 6
40 55014 Circle Pines MN 5 83/100
41 55057 Northfield MN 5
42 55319 Clear Lake MN 5
43 55449 Minneapolis MN 5 83/100
44 56308 Alexandria MN 5
45 56360 Osakis MN 5
46 55082 Stillwater MN 4 49/100
47 55372 Prior Lake MN 4 66/100
48 55395 Winsted MN 4
49 55421 Minneapolis MN 4 66/100
50 55444 Minneapolis MN 4
51 55901 Rochester MN 4
52 55912 Austin MN 4
53 56334 Glenwood MN 4
54 55011 Cedar MN 3
55 55013 Chisago City MN 3
56 55021 Faribault MN 3
57 55126 Saint Paul MN 3 65/100
58 55127 Saint Paul MN 3 65/100
59 55432 Minneapolis MN 3 83/100
60 55601 Beaver Bay MN 3
61 55614 Silver Bay MN 3
62 55709 Bovey MN 3
63 55720 Cloquet MN 3 66/100
64 55744 Grand Rapids MN 3
65 55810 Duluth MN 3 83/100
66 55811 Duluth MN 3 83/100
67 55921 Caledonia MN 3
68 55959 Minnesota City MN 3
69 55963 Pine Island MN 3 66/100
70 55987 Winona MN 3 65/100
71 56119 Brewster MN 3
72 56150 Lakefield MN 3
73 56187 Worthington MN 3
74 56301 Saint Cloud MN 3 66/100
75 56342 Isle MN 3
76 56386 Wahkon MN 3
77 55003 Bayport MN 2
78 55019 Dundas MN 2
79 55025 Forest Lake MN 2 66/100
80 55068 Rosemount MN 2 66/100
81 55069 Rush City MN 2
82 55092 Wyoming MN 2 83/100
83 55308 Becker MN 2
84 55309 Big Lake MN 2
85 55311 Osseo MN 2 66/100
86 55327 Dayton MN 2
87 55350 Hutchinson MN 2
88 55354 Lester Prairie MN 2
89 55360 Mayer MN 2
90 55369 Osseo MN 2 66/100
91 55374 Rogers MN 2 66/100
92 55378 Savage MN 2 67/100
93 55379 Shakopee MN 2 66/100
94 55381 Silver Lake MN 2
95 55388 Watertown MN 2
96 55397 Young America MN 2
97 55410 Minneapolis MN 2 66/100
98 55416 Minneapolis MN 2 66/100
99 55423 Minneapolis MN 2 66/100
100 55424 Minneapolis MN 2 66/100

Methodology

Violation counts include all types recorded in the EPA SDWIS database: Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) violations, treatment technique violations, and monitoring/reporting violations. Both resolved and unresolved violations are counted. Higher counts may reflect longer system histories or larger service areas.

Data sources: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), FEMA National Flood Insurance Program, EPA radon zone maps, EIA electricity rates, and Consumer Confidence Reports. Last updated: 2026-08-31.

Frequently Asked Questions

What counts as an EPA water violation?

EPA violations include exceeding Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs), failing to treat water properly (treatment technique violations), and not testing or reporting on schedule (monitoring violations). Health-based violations are the most serious.

Does a high violation count mean the water is unsafe now?

Not necessarily. Many violations are historical or monitoring-related. However, a pattern of repeated violations indicates systemic issues with water system management or infrastructure.

Explore More Rankings

How this ranking is calculated, data sources, and limitations: Rankings Methodology →


Related Rankings

Home Safety 2026 Water compliance, PFAS, radon, and annual AQI score inputs PFAS 2026 Forever chemicals detected in drinking water Lead Risk 2026 Lead pipe infrastructure and EPA exceedances
Disclaimer: Rankings are based on EPA, FEMA, and federal agency data. They reflect historical patterns and risk indicators, not necessarily current conditions. For the most current information, contact your local water utility or request a Consumer Confidence Report.

Get safety alerts for Minnesota

Free updates when EPA data changes for this area. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy.

Share This Page

X Facebook
Check your water filter options Free tool - no phone call required.