2026 Rankings

Home Safety Rankings 2026 — Worst & Best ZIP Codes

Last updated: August 14, 2026

25/100 HIGHEST RISK Lockbourne, OH
100/100 LOWEST RISK Monitor, WA
11,155 ZIP Codes Ranked

Average Home Safety Score by State

Loading map…
F (0-39) D (40-54) C (55-69) B (70-84) A (85+)

Top 15 States

Rank State Avg Score
1 HI 100 (A)
2 LA 92 (A)
3 AR 91 (A)
4 VT 90 (A)
5 MS 89 (A)
6 OK 86 (A)
7 WA 86 (A)
8 MI 85 (A)
9 OR 85 (A)
10 NV 84 (B)
11 NY 84 (B)
12 TX 83 (B)
13 DE 81 (B)
14 FL 80 (B)
15 SC 80 (B)

Grade Distribution Across All ZIP Codes

11,155 total ZIP codes

States with Lowest Average Safety Scores

Six of the twenty-five lowest-scoring ZIP codes in the United States sit inside the city limits of Albany, New York. Three more — 91416, 91426, and 91436 — cluster in a single suburb of Los Angeles: Encino, California. Another three are in Dayton, Ohio. And at the very bottom of the list, below 41,000 other ZIP codes, is Lebanon, Nebraska: population 76, ZIP 69036, composite Home Safety Score of 0.

Welcome to the 2026 Home Safety Rankings. We analyzed 41,344 ZIP codes using four federal data sources — EPA drinking water violations, EPA lead testing samples, EPA county-level radon maps, and FEMA National Flood Insurance Program claims — and combined them into a single composite score from 0 to 100. The result is a ranking that answers one question: which U.S. ZIP codes have the most, and fewest, measurable environmental risk factors to the home.

What the data reveals. The geography of America's lowest-scoring ZIP codes is not random. Rural census-designated places in the northern Plains and Mountain West — Lebanon NE, Palco KS, Maxbass ND, Juliaetta ID, Wisner NE, Lance Creek WY — dominate the worst quartile because they rely on small community water systems with narrow compliance margins; a single violation can cascade. At the same time, a parallel cluster of urban ZIPs shows up in the top 25: Havertown PA, Albany NY, Dayton OH, Encino CA. Those appear for a different reason: older housing stock with lead service lines, dense EPA reporting, and documented historical violations that the compliance record never fully forgets.

The top of the list is just as revealing. Twenty-four of the twenty-five safest ZIP codes in the country are split between two states: Washington (sixteen ZIPs) and Alaska (eight). Alaska benefits from low housing density, shallow well infrastructure that avoids lead solder, and a total absence of FEMA flood claims in the largest villages. Western Washington sweeps the urban side of the leaderboard — Seattle, Bremerton, Lakewood, Silverdale, DuPont — because of consistent water system compliance, minimal radon exposure outside the eastern counties, and recent infrastructure investment. Texas leads the country with 2,649 ranked ZIPs, followed by California (2,630), New York (2,186), and Pennsylvania (2,184), giving every major state enough sample depth to produce meaningful within-state comparisons.

How to read this ranking. A composite score is a lens, not a verdict. A ZIP with a score of 40 and one with a score of 85 are not separated by an "unsafe vs. safe" threshold — they are separated by the number of measurable risk factors recorded by federal agencies for that postal delivery area. The score tells you where to look first. If you are shopping for a home, the list below tells you which risk factors a professional home inspector should prioritize in a specific ZIP. If you are already living in one of these areas, it tells you which questions to ask your water utility, your county health department, and your home insurer.

What this ranking does not tell you. It does not measure housing affordability, crime, school quality, commute times, or community amenities. It does not account for the age, condition, or material of the plumbing inside any specific building. It does not replace a water test at your own tap or a radon test in your own basement. And because small-town water systems have less coverage in the federal datasets, rural ZIPs often sit in the extreme tails — both the best and the worst — simply because their data is thinner. A score derived from 3 data components carries different weight than one derived from 4. Both are published here; see the rankings methodology for the full treatment.

The tables below list the twenty-five ZIP codes at the bottom and the twenty-five at the top of the composite Home Safety Score for 2026, followed by a state-level breakdown showing how each state's ZIP count contributes to the national distribution.

41,344 ZIP codes analyzed · Data last refreshed 2026-04-12

41,344 ZIP codes analyzed

41,344 ZIP codes analyzed

11,155 ZIP codes analyzed

25 Worst ZIP Codes

# ZIP Code City State Safety Score Grade Component Coverage
1 43137 Lockbourne OH 25/100 F 4/4
2 43207 Columbus OH 25/100 F 4/4
3 15108 Coraopolis PA 27/100 F 4/4
4 43119 Galloway OH 28/100 F 4/4
5 80550 Windsor CO 31/100 F 4/4
6 43123 Grove City OH 32/100 F 4/4
7 43125 Groveport OH 32/100 F 4/4
8 02874 Saunderstown RI 33/100 F 4/4
9 02879 Wakefield RI 33/100 F 4/4
10 02881 Kingston RI 33/100 F 4/4
11 02892 West Kingston RI 33/100 F 4/4
12 06482 Sandy Hook CT 33/100 F 4/4
13 06488 Southbury CT 33/100 F 4/4
14 06804 Brookfield CT 33/100 F 4/4
15 06810 Danbury CT 33/100 F 4/4
16 06811 Danbury CT 33/100 F 4/4
17 07005 Boonton NJ 33/100 F 4/4
18 07734 Keansburg NJ 33/100 F 4/4
19 07748 Middletown NJ 33/100 F 4/4
20 07801 Dover NJ 33/100 F 4/4
21 07828 Budd Lake NJ 33/100 F 4/4
22 07834 Denville NJ 33/100 F 4/4
23 07836 Flanders NJ 33/100 F 4/4
24 07840 Hackettstown NJ 33/100 F 4/4
25 07853 Long Valley NJ 33/100 F 4/4

25 Best ZIP Codes

# ZIP Code City State Safety Score Grade Component Coverage
1 98836 Monitor WA 100/100 A 4/4
2 98644 Seaview WA 100/100 A 4/4
3 98631 Long Beach WA 100/100 A 4/4
4 98586 South Bend WA 100/100 A 4/4
5 98577 Raymond WA 100/100 A 4/4
6 98467 University Place WA 100/100 A 4/4
7 98466 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
8 98465 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
9 98443 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
10 98418 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
11 98416 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
12 98409 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
13 98408 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
14 98407 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
15 98406 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
16 98405 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
17 98404 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
18 98403 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
19 98402 Tacoma WA 100/100 A 4/4
20 98358 Nordland WA 100/100 A 4/4
21 98354 Milton WA 100/100 A 4/4
22 98353 Manchester WA 100/100 A 4/4
23 98340 Hansville WA 100/100 A 4/4
24 98339 Port Hadlock WA 100/100 A 4/4
25 98337 Bremerton WA 100/100 A 4/4

Rankings by State

State ZIP Codes
California 1,046
Texas 794
Pennsylvania 737
Florida 705
New York 699
Ohio 522
Illinois 454
Massachusetts 397
New Jersey 375
Michigan 303
Washington 289
Missouri 248
North Carolina 246
Arizona 238
Indiana 233
Colorado 221
Tennessee 218
Kentucky 208
Maryland 206
Louisiana 202
Alabama 197
Virginia 196
Connecticut 188
Oklahoma 178
Wisconsin 177

Methodology

The current versioned Home Safety Score combines four independently validated components: EPA SDWIS water-compliance history, PFAS MCL screening, EPA radon zones, and annual EPA Air Quality Index data. Components roll up into three equally weighted domains. A score is published only when every required domain is observed; missing evidence remains unavailable.

Last updated: 2026-08-14.

Frequently Asked Questions

How are these rankings calculated?

Rankings are based on federal agency data including EPA, FEMA, USGS, and PHMSA. Each ZIP code receives a score based on the specific risk factors for this category. See the methodology section above for details.

How often are rankings updated?

Rankings are regenerated quarterly using the latest available data. The date shown reflects the most recent update.

Explore More 2026 Rankings

See Also

How this ranking is calculated, data sources, and limitations: Rankings Methodology →


Related Rankings

Water Safety 2026 EPA violations and water quality scores Lead Risk 2026 Lead pipe infrastructure and EPA exceedances Infrastructure 2026 Aging pipes, system age and remediation costs
Disclaimer: Rankings are based on EPA, FEMA, and federal agency data. They reflect historical patterns and risk indicators, not necessarily current conditions. For the most current information, contact your local water utility or request a Consumer Confidence Report.

Attribution link required. Data updated quarterly.

Get safety alerts

Free updates when EPA data changes for this area. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy.

Share This Page

X Facebook
Check your water filter options Free tool - no phone call required.