Clasificaciones 2026

Peor infraestructura: New York Área metropolitana — 2026

Última actualización: 4 de junio de 2026

217 códigos postales clasificados por Pipe Failure Risk N.º 1: código postal 10033 (New York, NY) — 68%

Out of 217 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in the New York metro area, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 217
Highest risk 68%
Median risk 36%
Average risk 43%

Top 100 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 10033 New York NY 68% Very High 68/100
2 10024 New York NY 67% Very High 76/100
3 10031 New York NY 67% Very High 81/100
4 10034 New York NY 67% Very High 76/100
5 10014 New York NY 66% Very High 71/100
6 10032 New York NY 66% Very High 56/100
7 10040 New York NY 66% Very High 81/100
8 10012 New York NY 65% Very High 76/100
9 10025 New York NY 65% Very High 76/100
10 10003 New York NY 64% Very High 76/100
11 10006 New York NY 64% Very High 76/100
12 10009 New York NY 64% Very High 71/100
13 10013 New York NY 63% Very High 71/100
14 10027 New York NY 63% Very High 73/100
15 10002 New York NY 62% Very High 76/100
16 10011 New York NY 62% Very High 71/100
17 10028 New York NY 62% Very High 76/100
18 10030 New York NY 62% Very High 81/100
19 10065 New York NY 62% Very High 76/100
20 10005 New York NY 61% Very High 76/100
21 10023 New York NY 61% Very High 76/100
22 10075 New York NY 61% Very High 81/100
23 10010 New York NY 60% High 71/100
24 10021 New York NY 60% High 71/100
25 10022 New York NY 60% High 76/100
26 10039 New York NY 60% High 76/100
27 10128 New York NY 60% High 71/100
28 10017 New York NY 59% High 76/100
29 10026 New York NY 59% High 81/100
30 10037 New York NY 59% High 71/100
31 10162 New York NY 59% High 81/100
32 10029 New York NY 58% High 71/100
33 10004 New York NY 57% High 71/100
34 10016 New York NY 57% High 71/100
35 10038 New York NY 57% High 71/100
36 12167 Stamford NY 56% High 69/100
37 14513 Newark NY 56% High 67/100
38 06906 Stamford CT 56% High 64/100
39 07112 Newark NJ 56% High 82/100
40 08014 Bridgeport NJ 56% High 55/100
41 10019 New York NY 55% High 76/100
42 07106 Newark NJ 55% High 77/100
43 10035 New York NY 54% High 71/100
44 10152 New York NY 54% High 81/100
45 06903 Stamford CT 54% High 59/100
46 06907 Stamford CT 54% High 64/100
47 06905 Stamford CT 53% High 59/100
48 10001 New York NY 52% High 76/100
49 10036 New York NY 52% High 81/100
50 06607 Bridgeport CT 52% High 45/100
51 07107 Newark NJ 52% High 82/100
52 13811 Newark Valley NY 51% High 57/100
53 07104 Newark NJ 51% High 77/100
54 06604 Bridgeport CT 50% High 35/100
55 06610 Bridgeport CT 50% High 45/100
56 10007 New York NY 49% High 76/100
57 10044 New York NY 49% High 81/100
58 06605 Bridgeport CT 49% High 35/100
59 07304 Jersey City NJ 49% High 45/100
60 07307 Jersey City NJ 49% High 63/100
61 10280 New York NY 48% High 76/100
62 06902 Stamford CT 48% High 54/100
63 07105 Newark NJ 48% High 72/100
64 06606 Bridgeport CT 47% High 35/100
65 06608 Bridgeport CT 47% High 45/100
66 07102 Newark NJ 47% High 82/100
67 07306 Jersey City NJ 47% High 50/100
68 07108 Newark NJ 46% High 82/100
69 10018 New York NY 45% High 76/100
70 13417 New York Mills NY 45% High 45/100
71 07114 Newark NJ 45% High 72/100
72 13030 Bridgeport NY 44% High 40/100
73 07305 Jersey City NJ 43% High 45/100
74 06901 Stamford CT 39% Moderate 69/100
75 07103 Newark NJ 39% Moderate 82/100
76 07101 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
77 07175 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
78 07184 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
79 07188 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
80 07189 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
81 07191 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
82 07192 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
83 07193 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
84 07195 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
85 07198 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
86 07199 Newark NJ 37% Moderate 82/100
87 10008 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
88 10015 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
89 10020 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
90 10041 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
91 10043 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
92 10045 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
93 10047 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
94 10055 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
95 10060 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
96 10079 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
97 10080 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
98 10081 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
99 10082 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100
100 10087 New York NY 36% Moderate 81/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-06-04.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

Cómo se calcula esta clasificación, fuentes de datos y limitaciones: Metodología de clasificaciones →


Clasificaciones relacionadas

Seguridad del agua 2026 Infracciones de la EPA y puntuaciones de calidad del agua Riesgo de plomo 2026 Infraestructura de tuberías de plomo y excedencias de la EPA Infraestructura 2026 Tuberías envejecidas, antigüedad del sistema y costos de remediación
Aviso: Las clasificaciones se basan en datos de la EPA, la FEMA y agencias federales. Reflejan patrones históricos e indicadores de riesgo, no necesariamente las condiciones actuales. Para obtener la información más actual, los residentes pueden comunicarse con la compañía local de agua o solicitar un Informe de Confianza del Consumidor (CCR).

Reciba alertas de seguridad

Actualizaciones gratuitas cuando la EPA publique nuevos datos para esta zona. Sin spam.

Puede cancelar la suscripción en cualquier momento. Política de privacidad.

Compartir esta página

X Facebook
Ver opciones de filtros de agua Herramienta gratuita — sin llamada telefónica requerida.