Out of 1,132 ZIP codes in North Carolina with earthquake data, these have the highest seismic risk.
| Statistic |
Value |
| ZIP codes ranked |
1,132 |
| Avg earthquake risk (top 100) |
8/50 |
Top 100 ZIP Codes
| Rank |
ZIP |
City |
Risk Score |
Rating |
Expected Annual Loss |
| 1 |
28238 |
Robeson County |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 2 |
28319 |
Barnesville |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 3 |
28340 |
Fairmont |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 4 |
28357 |
Lumber Bridge |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 5 |
28358 |
Lumberton |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 6 |
28360 |
Lumberton |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 7 |
28362 |
Marietta |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 8 |
28364 |
Maxton |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 9 |
28369 |
Orrum |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 10 |
28371 |
Parkton |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 11 |
28372 |
Pembroke |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 12 |
28375 |
Proctorville |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 13 |
28377 |
Red Springs |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 14 |
28378 |
Rex |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 15 |
28383 |
Rowland |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 16 |
28384 |
Saint Pauls |
8.2/50 |
Relatively Low |
$451K |
| 17 |
27152 |
Winston Salem |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 18 |
28031 |
Cornelius |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 19 |
28035 |
Davidson |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 20 |
28036 |
Davidson |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 21 |
28070 |
Huntersville |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 22 |
28078 |
Huntersville |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 23 |
28105 |
Matthews |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 24 |
28106 |
Matthews |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 25 |
28126 |
Newell |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 26 |
28130 |
Paw Creek |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 27 |
28134 |
Pineville |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 28 |
28200 |
Mecklenburg County |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 29 |
28201 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 30 |
28202 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 31 |
28203 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 32 |
28204 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 33 |
28205 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 34 |
28206 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 35 |
28207 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 36 |
28208 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 37 |
28209 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 38 |
28210 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 39 |
28211 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 40 |
28212 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 41 |
28213 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 42 |
28214 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 43 |
28215 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 44 |
28216 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 45 |
28217 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 46 |
28218 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 47 |
28219 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 48 |
28220 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 49 |
28221 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 50 |
28222 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 51 |
28223 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 52 |
28224 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 53 |
28226 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 54 |
28227 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 55 |
28228 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 56 |
28229 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 57 |
28230 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 58 |
28231 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 59 |
28232 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 60 |
28233 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 61 |
28234 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 62 |
28235 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 63 |
28236 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 64 |
28237 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 65 |
28241 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 66 |
28242 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 67 |
28243 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 68 |
28244 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 69 |
28246 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 70 |
28247 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 71 |
28250 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 72 |
28253 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 73 |
28254 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 74 |
28255 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 75 |
28256 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 76 |
28258 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 77 |
28260 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 78 |
28262 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 79 |
28263 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 80 |
28265 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 81 |
28266 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 82 |
28269 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 83 |
28270 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 84 |
28271 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 85 |
28272 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 86 |
28273 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 87 |
28274 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 88 |
28275 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 89 |
28277 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 90 |
28278 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 91 |
28280 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 92 |
28281 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 93 |
28285 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 94 |
28287 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 95 |
28288 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 96 |
28289 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 97 |
28290 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 98 |
28296 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 99 |
28297 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
| 100 |
28299 |
Charlotte |
7.9/50 |
Relatively Low |
$2.8M |
Explore More