3 violations recorded in 2021
Health Violations Found
C 61

Cosmos, MN (56228): 4 Health Violations — 61/100 (2026)

EPA data for Cosmos

Health Violations Found High Radon Risk

Cosmos, MN — ZIP 56228 — carries 4 health-based EPA violations, meaning contaminant MCL thresholds were exceeded.

Data source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) SDWIS Last verified: April 2, 2026

Based on EPA Drinking Water FEMA Flood Data U.S. Census CDC Energy Information Admin. USGS Water Data & 9 more federal sources
Today's Safety: Good
Violations: None Alerts: 0
2026-06-03
Your water right now: 4 health violations
AQI: NaN (Unhealthy) Lead: 5.0 ppb
See details ↓
Updated: 2026-06-03
Safety Score
C 61/100
▼ -1 vs last year
Water Quality Issues 4 health violations
Lead Risk Safe 0.005 mg/L
Flood Risk N/A
Data confidence: High (direct measurement) Medium (sampled / sub-geography) Low (modeled / inferred) Methodology →

At a Glance

  • Water EPA records show 4 health-based violations on the water system serving this ZIP (5-year window).
  • Lead Lead reading of 0.005 mg/L is below EPA action level but elevated; filtration is advisable.
  • Radon EPA Zone 1 — predicted average indoor radon above 4 pCi/L. Test your home.

Composite Home Safety Score has been stable over the tracking period.

Contaminant Summary
Health Violations
4 / 10 exceed limits
10 tested 4 violations 4 health-based
Data updated: Apr 2026 All data sources current

What’s Happening in Cosmos, Minnesota

4 active health-based violations are currently on record for the water system serving this ZIP. This area is in EPA Radon Zone 1 (highest risk).

What's Happening

declining

New violation reported

3 violations were reported in 2021.

Updated 2026-06-03 · Based on EPA and public utility data

C
Home Safety Score: 61 / 100
↓ -1 vs 2025
1
Water System
513
People Served
4
Health Violations (5yr)Median is 0 — most ZIPs have none
Groundwater
Water Source
0.005 mg/L
Lead Level2.5× the national median
Zone 1
Radon Risk · High
$120K
Median Home Value46% below state median ($221K)
🏠
Your #1 Priority

Have your pipes inspected for lead solder

84% of homes in this ZIP were built before 1986, when lead solder was banned. Older plumbing may leach lead into drinking water, especially in the morning or after standing overnight.

Pipe inspection: $100–$300. Lead pipe replacement: $3,000–$8,000. EPA: Reducing Lead Exposure →

Recommended Buyer Guides for This ZIP

Independent guides — grounded in EPA, NSF, FEMA, and CDC standards. Matched to risks detected in your area.

This Summer — what to check

Season-specific maintenance for home safety. Universal tasks — apply everywhere unless noted.

  • Water Heater

    Flush sediment (1–2×/year). Cuts energy use and prevents bacterial growth in low-use hot-water pockets.

    Source: DOE
  • Wildfire & Smoke

    Clear leaves and debris from gutters and the 30-ft home-ignition zone. Replace HVAC filters with MERV 13+.

    Source: Firewise
  • HVAC Filter

    Peak AC run. Replace filters monthly during high pollen / wildfire-smoke days; standard interval otherwise.

    Source: EPA IAQ

Get notified when water quality changes in your area

Free alerts when new EPA data affects ZIP code 56228. No spam — just safety updates.

Unsubscribe anytime. We only send updates when your safety score changes. See our Privacy Policy.

Share Your Home Safety Score

Tip: You can also screenshot the card above to share it as an image.

Lead Level: higher than 82% of U.S. ZIP codes EPA Violations: more than 68% of U.S. ZIP codes Health Violations: more than 92% of U.S. ZIP codes

How Cosmos Compares

Safety Score vs. Meeker County and Minnesota averages

Safety Score
Cosmos
61
Meeker County
64
Minnesota avg
62
Worse than 86% of ZIPs in Meeker County 5.6x more violations than county average
Metric Cosmos Meeker County Minnesota
Safety Score 61 64 62
EPA Violations (total) 4 0.7 0.9
Lead (ppb) 5 3.4 3.4

County and state averages computed from 41,344 ZIP codes. Data: EPA SDWIS.

⚠️
Risk Signals Detected
Risk factors detected for Cosmos (56228)

Each number below connects you directly to a licensed specialist contractor in your area. Calls are free.

EPA Lead and Copper Rule Revision (LCRR) requires utilities to inventory and begin replacing lead service lines

84% of homes built before 1986 (lead solder ban year)

Latest lead sampling: 5.0 ppb

Lead pipe risk assessment: high

State LCRI funding: $29M allocated for lead pipe replacement

What to do Contact your water utility to check if your service line is lead. Request free lead testing and ask about LCRR replacement programs.
Estimated cost: $0 for utility check, $3,000–$10,000 if private-side replacement needed

🔍Key Insights for Cosmos 56228

Derived from EPA, Census, FEMA, and EIA data — exclusive to ZipCheckup

Water System Reliability
76 /100 Good
Reliability score based on violation trends, system size, CCR compliance, and enforcement history. The national median is 10/100.
Infrastructure Investment Gap
$38,808
Estimated per-household infrastructure deficit based on housing age, pipe materials, lead risk, and water system violations. That's 3880.8x the national median of $10.
Seasonal Risk
High Seasonal
Year-round contamination risk from seasonal factors: radon peaks in winter, flooding in spring, air quality in summer. Key factors: High radon zone (winter peak), Aging pipes (freeze/thaw risk).
Environmental Justice Index
48 /100 Moderate
Communities with high violations, low income, and environmental hazards face disproportionate risk. Higher score = greater environmental justice concern. The national median is 10/100.
Home Purchase Risk
49 /100 Moderate Risk
Composite "should I buy here?" score for homebuyers. Weighs water quality (25%), flood risk (20%), lead (15%), energy costs (15%), housing age (10%), radon (10%), and air quality (5%). The national median is 10/100.
Methodology: Lead exposure combines EPA LCR testing, Census housing age (ACS B25034), and LCRI service line estimates. Maintenance debt uses Census median build year and NAHB equipment lifespan data. Compliance risk weights health violations, unresolved issues, and EPA enforcement actions. Energy burden uses EIA state rates and Census B19013 median income. Flood cost uses FEMA NFIP claims data (1978–2024) divided by housing units. Water system reliability cross-references violation trends, system size, CCR compliance, and enforcement history. Infrastructure gap estimates deferred costs from housing vintage, pipe materials, and lead detection. Seasonal risk combines radon zones, flood zones, housing age, and air quality data. Environmental justice index weights violations, income disparity, Superfund proximity, and enforcement actions. Home purchase risk is a weighted composite of all environmental and infrastructure factors. Full methodology →
📊 ZipCheckup Cross-Reference Engine · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Score Breakdown

How your Home Safety Score of 46 is calculated.

Water
13/33
Lead
33/33
Radon
0/33
46 = Water 13/33 + Lead 33/33 + Radon 0/33

Score dropped 1 point over 90 days.

Safety & Health (8) HIGH

Compliance Alerts for 56228

3 issues flagged based on EPA data, state regulations, and housing age estimates.

Lead Pipes
Action Needed
High probability of lead service lines. Test water and consider filter.
Electrical Panels
Monitor
FPE/Zinsco panel risk — 84
Radon Risk
Action Needed
EPA Radon Zone 1 — highest potential. Home testing strongly advised.

Estimates based on EPA data, U.S. Census ACS housing vintage, and state regulations. Individual homes may vary.

📊 EPA + Census ACS + State Regs · Updated March 2026

Compliance Risk Forecast

Probability of future drinking water violations based on historical patterns, enforcement trends, and system size.

High Risk ▼ Declining trend

95% probability of new violation within 2 years

1-Year 89%
2-Year 95%
3-Year 95%

Based on 2.18 events/year rate. Model uses Poisson distribution with trend and system-size adjustments.

Service Disruption Risk

Critical
95%

95% estimated probability of a boil water advisory or service interruption in the next 90 days.

Based on infrastructure age, EPA violation history, flood exposure, and seasonal patterns.

Contributing Factors
Infrastructure Age
+30%
Violation History
+30%
Health Violations
+30%
Seasonal Baseline
+10%

Estimates based on EPA enforcement data, U.S. Census ACS housing vintage, and FEMA flood claims. Not a guarantee of disruption.

📊 EPA + Census ACS + FEMA · Updated March 2026

Your Water System

ZIP code 56228 in Cosmos, Minnesota is served by Cosmos (EPA ID: MN1470011). This system provides water to approximately 513 people from groundwater sources.

Home Safety Score: C (61/100)

Based on water quality violations, lead levels, and radon risk in your area. This score is better than 31% of ZIP codes nationally and 38% in Minnesota.

Factor Status Details
Water Quality poor 4 violations, 4 health-based
Lead in Water safe 0.005 mg/L (EPA action level: 0.015 mg/L)
Radon Risk High Zone 1
Gas Safety low 0 incidents, score 0/100
Wildfire Smoke low score 19/100, 4 county fires (5yr)
Earthquake Risk Very Low score 0.6/50
Superfund NPL Very Low nearest 45.3 mi (null), 0 sites within 10 km

Lead & Copper in Your Water

The EPA requires water systems to monitor lead and copper levels under the Lead and Copper Rule.

Metal Measured Level EPA Action Level Status Sample Date
Lead 0.005 mg/L 0.015 mg/L Within limit N/A

Radon Risk

Radon Zone 1 — High potential (Meeker County)

EPA recommends all homes in this area be tested for radon. Zone 1 indicates the highest radon potential (predicted average indoor radon screening level greater than 4 pCi/L).

CO & Gas Safety

Gas Distribution Risk: Low (score: 0/100)

No gas distribution incidents recorded in this county since 2004.

The CPSC recommends CO detectors on every level of your home. Have gas appliances inspected annually by a licensed technician.

Wildfire & Smoke Risk

Smoke Risk: Low (score: 19/100)

4 wildfires recorded in this county over the past 5 years. Nearest recent wildfire: 37 km (23 miles).

Monitor air quality at AirNow.gov during fire season (June–November). A HEPA air purifier can reduce indoor PM2.5 by up to 80% during smoke events.

Earthquake & Seismic Risk

Risk Rating: Very Low (score: 0.6/50)

Metric Value
Risk Score 0.6
Risk Rating Very Low
Annual Frequency < 0.001 damaging events/yr
Expected Annual Loss $2K (Very Low)

Monitor seismic activity at the USGS Earthquake Map. Secure heavy furniture, maintain an emergency kit, and know your gas shutoff location.

Superfund Site Proximity

Proximity Risk: Very Low (score: 0/100)

Nearest NPL site: null at 45.3 miles (72.9 km).

Radius NPL Sites
Within 5 km (3.1 mi) 0
Within 10 km (6.2 mi) 0
Within 25 km (15.5 mi) 0

Search nearby sites at the EPA Superfund Site Search. If you garden or use well water near an NPL site, consider soil and water testing.

Violation Summary

4 health-based violations recorded in the past 5 years. All violations have been resolved.

Contaminants Detected

The following contaminants have been flagged in EPA records for water systems serving this ZIP code:

Contaminant Category Violations Health-Based
Barium Inorganic 4 Yes

Energy Costs in MN

Residential electricity rate: 14.98¢/kWh — 12% below the national average (17.0¢/kWh).

Lower electricity rates in Minnesota make electric appliances and heat pumps a cost-effective choice compared to other states.

Energy Sources

Minnesota generates 31.9% of its electricity from renewable sources — 5% above the national average of 26.9%. Including nuclear, 53.6% of the state's power is carbon-free (EIA 2025).

Source Share
Wind 25.2%
Coal 23.2%
Nuclear 21.7%
Natural gas 20.8%
Solar 5.2%
Hydroelectric 1.5%

Need help with your water quality?

Typical cost: Water test: typically $20–$50 (DIY kit) · Professional inspection: $150–$400

Find the Right Water Filter

Free tip: Let cold water run for 2 minutes before drinking — this helps flush lead from your pipes.

What You Can Do

  1. Request your water system's Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) — Your utility is required to publish this annually
  2. Consider a home water test — Independent testing can reveal issues in your specific plumbing
  3. Install a certified water filter — NSF-certified filters can address specific contaminants
  4. Contact your water provider — Ask about current treatment and any ongoing remediation

Need help with water testing or filtration?

Typical cost: Water test: typically $20–$50 (DIY kit) · Professional inspection: $150–$400

Find the Right Water Filter

Free tip: Let cold water run for 2 minutes before drinking — this helps flush lead from your pipes.

Other Water Quality Reports in Minnesota

Nearby Water Quality Reports

Data Sources

This report uses public data from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS). View the full compliance record for Cosmos (MN1470011) on EPA.gov.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the tap water in 56228 safe to drink?

Cosmos's water system has recorded 4 health-based violations in the past 5 years. While the system is required to treat water to meet federal standards, you may want to consider additional precautions such as a certified water filter.

Where does 56228's water come from?

The primary water source for this area is groundwater. Cosmos serves approximately 513 people.

How can I get my water tested?

Contact your local water utility for a free water quality report, or hire a certified lab for independent home water testing. The EPA recommends testing annually if you use a private well.

Does 56228 have lead in the water?

Lead and Copper Rule sampling data for ZIP code 56228 shows a lead level of 0.005 mg/L, which is below the EPA action level of 0.015 mg/L. Still, older homes with lead service lines or pre-1986 plumbing may have higher levels at individual taps.

What is the radon risk in 56228?

ZIP code 56228 (Meeker County) falls in EPA Radon Zone 1, indicating high radon potential. The EPA recommends all homes in Zone 1 areas be tested for radon. Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that can accumulate in homes and is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the U.S.

USGS reports that 5 of the top compounds applied across the surrounding county are flagged by the EPA for drinking-water monitoring — see the agricultural pesticide-use section

📊 EPA Safe Drinking Water · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Contaminant Stress Analysis

Statistical envelope (p10/p50/p90) of measured contaminant levels compared to EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL). Based on enforcement and compliance monitoring data.

Arsenic (MG/L) 3 measurements
▬ Stable
MCL 10
p10: 0.02 p50: 0.02 p90: 0.03

All measured values of Arsenic remain below the MCL of 10 MG/L.

📊 EPA SDWIS Enforcement & Compliance · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Score History

Stable Score changed from 62 to 61 over 1615 days (-1)
30-day change: 0 90-day change: -1

Tracking since 2021-12-31 · 59 data points

Safety Score Timeline

85+ 70–84 55–69 <55 Oldest → Newest · 24 data points

Environmental Incidents

13
Active Issues
EPA enforcement actions & health violations in 56228 (last 5 years)
Enforcement Actions
10
1 formal
Health Violations
3
0 unresolved
Last Enforcement
2023-03-06
Last Violation
2021-10-01

Health-Based Violations

Arsenic — 0.0208 MG/L
Resolved
MCL violation · 2021-10-01 to 2021-12-31
Arsenic — 0.0253 MG/L
Resolved
MCL violation · 2021-07-01 to 2021-09-30
Arsenic — 0.023 MG/L
Resolved
MCL violation · 2021-04-01 to 2021-06-30

Enforcement Actions

State Order Extension
2023-03-06
State Informal Action
2022-02-28
State Filed Suit
2022-02-14
State Informal Action
2021-11-05
State Informal Action
2021-11-05
State Informal Enforcement
2021-11-05
State Informal Action
2021-09-24
State Informal Action
2021-09-24
State Informal Enforcement
2021-09-24
State Informal Action
2021-08-17

Understanding EPA Enforcement

  • MCL Violation — Contaminant exceeded the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
  • Treatment Technique (TT) — Water system failed to follow required treatment methods
  • Formal Enforcement — EPA or state issued a legal order (administrative order, court action, or compliance order)
  • Resolved — The water system returned to compliance
This ZIP code has 1 formal enforcement action. Consider testing your water independently or using a water filter rated for the specific contaminants found.

Source: EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO). Data from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS). Updated quarterly.

Consumer Confidence Report

2025 Report

Annual water quality report published by Cosmos for ZIP code 56228.

10
Contaminants Tested
0
MCL Violations

Key Contaminants

Contaminant Level MCL Status
Lead 500 ppb 15 ppb Exceeds MCL
Arsenic 6.49 ppb 10 ppb Within Limit

What Is a Consumer Confidence Report?

Every community water system in the U.S. is required by the EPA to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR), also known as a Water Quality Report. It lists all detected contaminants, their levels compared to federal limits (MCLs), and information about where your water comes from.

How to Read Your CCR

  • MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) — the highest level of a contaminant allowed in drinking water
  • MCLG (Maximum Contaminant Level Goal) — the level below which there is no known health risk
  • Action Level — used for lead and copper; triggers treatment if exceeded at the 90th percentile
  • A violation means detected levels exceeded the MCL — your utility must notify you and take corrective action
📊 Water Utility CCR Report · Updated March 2026 · View source →
💧

Based on your water data

Reverse Osmosis (under-sink) · $150–$500 · NSF/ANSI 58, NSF/ANSI 372

Removes 99%+ of lead and PFAS. Addresses Lead and Arsenic detected in your water.

View details →
Reverse Osmosis (under-sink) · $180–$250 · NSF/ANSI 58

6-stage RO with alkaline remineralization. View details →

🧪 Verify your water first

CCR data shows community averages. A home water test confirms what's actually coming from your tap. Tap Score Advanced Lead & Heavy Metals ($149) — focused heavy metals panel at lower cost. Get test kit →

Product links are affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Recommendations are based on NSF certifications and EPA contaminant data, not advertiser influence. See our disclosure.

Childhood Environmental Risk Score — 56228

High Risk
69/100
Childhood Environmental Risk Score
Combining water lead, air toxics, housing age & EPA violations

This ZIP's score is higher than 88% of U.S. ZIP codes and 91% of those in Minnesota — a relative ranking, not a verdict on any home.

Risk Factor Breakdown

Housing Lead Paint Probability 65/100
56% of homes built before 1970, when lead paint was widely used.
Water System Violations 74/100
EPA water system violation history for this area.
What weighs most here

Water system violation history is the largest contributor to this ZIP's score. A pattern of violations can signal recurring quality issues worth monitoring, and reviewing a system's recent record helps families know what to ask about.

Pre-1970 Housing
56%
homes likely containing lead paint
EPA Radon Zone Zone 1
Zone 1 is the EPA's highest radon-potential designation. The EPA recommends that every home in a Zone 1 area be tested for radon.
Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas. Children spend more time at home than adults, and a radon test kit is inexpensive.
Important Health Information
  • Children under 6 are most vulnerable to lead exposure — there is no safe level of lead in blood
  • Test your home's drinking water, especially if your home was built before 1986
  • Consider a certified water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 for lead removal) for drinking and cooking water
  • Ask your pediatrician about blood lead level testing at well-child visits

What families can do

Here are calm, practical steps families in this ZIP can consider — informational guidance, not cause for alarm.

  • Consider a lead-paint inspection before renovating, since homes built before 1978 may contain lead paint.
  • Wet-wipe windowsills, floors, and play areas regularly — household dust is a common lead exposure path for young children.
  • Ask your pediatrician whether a blood lead test is appropriate at a child's next well-child visit.
Protect Your Family's Water
Know exactly what's in your tap water with a certified home water test kit.
Find the Right Water Filter →
Share with other parents

Know a family in 56228? A free 30-second ZIP check shows them the same lead, water, and housing data.

Disclaimer: This environmental health risk assessment uses publicly available data from the EPA, Census Bureau, and CDC to estimate relative risk levels. It is not a medical diagnosis or substitute for professional health advice. Individual exposure depends on many factors not captured in this analysis. Consult your pediatrician or local health department for specific guidance. Data sources: EPA AirToxScreen, EPA SDWIS, U.S. Census Bureau, CDC Childhood Blood Lead Surveillance.
📊 EPA AirToxScreen, SDWIS, Census, CDC · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Lead Pipe Replacement Funding for Minnesota

$28.6M
allocated in fiscal year 2025 for lead service line replacement
Up to $14.0M available as grants for disadvantaged communities (49% of allocation)

Key LCRI Deadlines

Now
Your water system must notify you if you have a lead service line
1
Oct 2027
Water systems must complete service line inventories
2
Oct 2034
All lead service lines must be replaced

What This Means for You

  • If your home was built before 1986, it may have lead service lines
  • Your water utility is required to inventory and replace lead lines at no cost to you
  • Contact your water utility to check if your address is in their inventory

Source: EPA DWSRF Lead Service Line Replacement Program, FY2025 Allotment Memorandum.

Active Alerts in Minnesota

0 active weather alerts in Minnesota. Severe weather can affect your water quality and home safety.

View alerts for Minnesota →

📊 NWS · Updated March 2026 · View source →
Environmental Hazards (9) MODERATE

Termite Risk for 56228

Slight Risk Zone
WDI Inspection Requirement

Not required for VA loans (low TIP zone); optional

Typical Inspection Cost
$85 – $150
Based on Minnesota market rates
Consequence

No mandatory inspection; low termite risk

Termite Damage in the U.S.

  • Termites cause an estimated $5 billion in property damage annually in the United States, according to the USDA.
  • Standard termite treatment costs $225–$2,500; fumigation for severe infestations: $2,000–$8,000.
  • Homeowner insurance typically does not cover termite damage, as it is considered preventable.

What Homeowners Should Know

  • Annual termite inspections are recommended in moderate-to-heavy risk zones. Early detection can prevent thousands in repair costs.
  • VA and FHA loans require a clear NPMA-33 (Wood Destroying Insect Inspection Report) for closing in most states.
  • Warning signs: mud tubes on foundation walls, hollow-sounding wood, discarded wings near windows, and frass (droppings) near baseboards.
  • Preventive treatment ($200–$900 per year) is far less expensive than structural damage repair, which averages $3,000 and can exceed $50,000.
  • Even in lower-risk zones, subterranean termites can be active. Consider an inspection if purchasing an older home or if you notice warning signs.
Reference: Outside VA/FHA mandatory WDI zone

Source: USDA Forest Service Termite Infestation Probability (TIP) zones, VA/FHA lender requirements, Minnesota pest control regulations. Inspection cost estimates reflect typical market rates and may vary by provider, property size, and location. This information is for general guidance only.

Pest Risk for 56228

Moderate Pest Pressure
Top Pest Threats in Minnesota

ticks, mosquitoes, bed bugs, carpenter ants and rodents

Typical Pest Inspection Cost
$85 – $200
Based on Minnesota market rates
Licensed Applicator Required
Yes
Minnesota pesticide regulations
⚠ CDC / EPA Disease Zone Alerts
  • Lyme disease endemic area
  • West Nile activity zone
Real Estate Transaction Requirement

Required for VA loans in all states; not state-mandated

Penalty for Unlicensed Application

Up to $10,000 per violation

Why This Matters

  • Health risks: Mosquitoes transmit West Nile virus (1,000+ U.S. cases annually). Ticks spread Lyme disease (estimated 476,000 cases/year per CDC). Rodent droppings can carry hantavirus.
  • Property damage: Carpenter ants and termites cause billions in structural damage annually. Rodents gnaw wiring, creating fire hazards.
  • Food safety: Cockroaches and rodents contaminate food preparation areas and can trigger allergies and asthma, especially in children.
  • Minnesota experiences seasonal pest pressure peaks. Annual inspections help catch infestations early before they become costly.

Common Questions

Do I need a pest inspection before buying a home in Minnesota?
VA and FHA loans require a Wood Destroying Insect (WDI) inspection in all states. Required for VA loans in all states; not state-mandated Even when not legally required, a professional pest inspection ($85–$200) can reveal hidden infestations that cost thousands to remediate.
Can I apply pesticides myself in Minnesota?
Homeowners can generally use over-the-counter pesticide products on their own property. However, restricted-use pesticides require a licensed applicator in Minnesota. Commercial pest control services must be licensed. Up to $10,000 per violation.
What are the most common pests in Minnesota?
The top pest threats in Minnesota include ticks, mosquitoes, bed bugs, carpenter ants and rodents. Pest activity varies by season and local conditions. Seasonal inspections can help catch infestations early.
Legal Reference: Minnesota Pesticide Control Law (Minn. Stat. §18B)

Source: CDC vector-borne disease surveillance, EPA pesticide regulation data, Minnesota pest control board, NPMA pest prevalence maps. Inspection cost estimates reflect typical market rates and may vary by provider, property size, and location. This information is for general guidance only.

Wildfire & Smoke Risk Profile

19
Low Smoke Risk
Wildfire smoke exposure risk score for 56228
Nearest Fire
23 mi
37 km to nearest recent wildfire
County Fires (5yr)
4
wildfires in county since 2021
Risk Level
Low
based on fire proximity & history
Air Quality
Generally Good
during fire season (Jun–Nov)
SMOKE RISK SCORE 19/100
0 — Minimal 100 — Highest Risk

Wildfire Smoke Safety Tips

  • Air purifier with HEPA filter: run in the room where you spend the most time. Close windows and doors during smoke events.
  • N95 or KN95 masks: standard cloth and surgical masks do not filter fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from wildfire smoke.
  • Seal gaps: use wet towels or tape around doors and windows to reduce smoke infiltration during poor air quality days.
  • Monitor AQI: check AirNow.gov daily during fire season. AQI above 100 = unhealthy for sensitive groups; above 150 = unhealthy for everyone.
  • Create a clean room: designate one room with the air purifier running, keep it sealed, and limit time outdoors when AQI is elevated.

Protect Your Indoor Air from Wildfire Smoke

A HEPA air purifier can reduce indoor PM2.5 by up to 80% during smoke events. Portable units for a single room start at $80. Whole-home solutions start at $300.

Product links may earn a commission — see our disclosure.

📊 NIFC Wildfire Data & EPA AirNow · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Earthquake & Seismic Risk Profile

0.6
VERY LOW RISK
FEMA National Risk Index earthquake score for 56228
Risk Rating
Very Low
FEMA earthquake hazard classification
Expected Annual Loss
$2K
estimated county-level annual loss (Very Low)
Annual Frequency
< 0.001
expected damaging earthquakes per year
Structural Vulnerability
Moderate
based on housing age (74 yr median) + seismic zone
EARTHQUAKE RISK SCORE 0.6/50
0 — Minimal 50 — Highest Risk

Earthquake Preparedness Tips

  • Secure heavy furniture: anchor bookshelves, water heaters, and large appliances to wall studs. Unsecured items cause most earthquake injuries.
  • Emergency kit: water (1 gallon per person per day for 3 days), non-perishable food, flashlight, batteries, first aid kit, wrench to turn off gas. Keep kits at home and in your car.
  • Know how to shut off gas: locate the gas meter shutoff valve and keep a wrench nearby. Gas leaks are a leading cause of post-earthquake fires.
  • Drop, Cover, Hold On: during shaking, drop to hands and knees, take cover under a sturdy table, and hold on. Do not stand in doorways or run outside.
  • Structural retrofit: homes built before 1980 may need foundation bolting or cripple wall bracing. FEMA's earthquake resources offer guidance on retrofitting.
  • USGS ShakeMap: monitor real-time and recent seismic activity at earthquake.usgs.gov.

Build Your Earthquake Preparedness Kit

FEMA recommends every household in a seismic zone maintain a 72-hour emergency kit. Pre-assembled kits start at $40 and include water, food, first aid, and tools.

Product links may earn a commission — see our disclosure.

📊 FEMA National Risk Index & USGS · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Mold Risk Assessment for 56228

Moderate Risk
51/100
Mold Probability Score
Based on humidity, housing age, flood history & water infrastructure
Avg. Humidity
68%
annual relative humidity
Summer Humidity
68%
Jun–Aug average
Median Home Age
1952
median year built
Flood Claims
0
FEMA insurance claims
Seasonal Risk

Summer months (June–August) present the highest mold risk in 56228, with average humidity reaching 68%. Indoor humidity can be 10–15% higher in poorly ventilated spaces. Winter humidity drops to 68%, reducing but not eliminating risk.

Why Mold Matters

  • The CDC and EPA identify mold as a significant indoor health hazard. Common symptoms include respiratory irritation, allergic reactions, and asthma exacerbation.
  • Mold begins growing within 24–48 hours on damp surfaces when relative humidity exceeds 60%. Bathrooms, basements, and crawl spaces are most vulnerable.
  • Professional mold remediation costs $1,500–$9,000 on average. Homeowner insurance often excludes mold coverage unless caused by a "covered peril."
  • Homes built before 1980 typically lack modern vapor barriers and ventilation systems, increasing moisture infiltration risk.

Prevention Recommendations

  • Use a dehumidifier to keep indoor humidity below 50%. This is especially important in basements, crawl spaces, and bathrooms in high-humidity areas like 56228.
  • Ensure proper ventilation: use exhaust fans in bathrooms and kitchens, and keep attic and crawl space vents unblocked.
  • Fix leaks immediately. Even small plumbing leaks can create mold-favorable conditions within 48 hours.
  • Homes built around 1952 often lack modern vapor barriers. Consider a professional moisture assessment to identify hidden problem areas.
  • Monitor indoor humidity with a hygrometer ($10–$20). Target 30–50% year-round.
Recommended: Whole-Home Dehumidifier

With 68% average humidity, a dehumidifier is the most effective way to reduce mold risk in 56228. Energy Star-rated units cost $200–$400 and can reduce humidity by 20–30%.

Compare Dehumidifiers
As an Amazon Associate, ZipCheckup earns from qualifying purchases.
Sources: NOAA Climate Normals 1991–2020 (humidity), U.S. Census ACS (housing age), FEMA NFIP (flood claims), EPA SDWIS (water violations). Score methodology: humidity 40%, housing age 30%, flood history 20%, water infrastructure 10%.

Respiratory Risk Today

High Risk
48
Respiratory Risk Score
Combined air quality, humidity & mold risk for 56228
Air Quality
N/A
EPA AQI index
Humidity
14/30
seasonal impact
Mold
15/30
housing + humidity
RISK SCORE 48/100
Low Moderate Severe
Mold risk is the primary respiratory factor
Older homes in humid climates are prone to hidden mold. Consider a professional mold inspection and a HEPA air purifier for occupied rooms.
Sources: EPA AirNow (daily AQI), NOAA humidity normals, mold risk model (housing age + humidity + flood history). Updated daily. Score combines air quality (40%), humidity stress (30%), and mold risk (30%).

Superfund Sites & Soil Contamination Risk

0
Very Low Proximity Risk
EPA Superfund NPL site proximity score for 56228
Nearest NPL Site
45.3 mi
72.9 km —
Sites Within 10 km
0
NPL sites within ~6.2 miles
Risk Level
Very Low
based on proximity & site status
Sites Within 25 km
0
NPL sites within ~15.5 miles
SUPERFUND PROXIMITY SCORE 0/100
0 — No nearby sites 100 — Highest Risk

What Are Superfund NPL Sites?

The National Priorities List (NPL) is the EPA's list of the most contaminated sites in the United States. These sites are eligible for federal cleanup funding under CERCLA (the "Superfund" law). Common contaminants include heavy metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), pesticides, and industrial solvents that can leach into soil, groundwater, and air.

  • Active Cleanup: EPA is investigating or remediating the site — contamination may still be present.
  • Construction Complete: Physical cleanup is done, but long-term monitoring continues.
  • Deleted: Site meets EPA cleanup standards and has been removed from the NPL.

Know What's in Your Soil

If you live near a Superfund site, a home soil test kit can detect heavy metals, lead, and other contaminants — especially important if you garden, have children, or use well water.

Product links may earn a commission — see our disclosure.

📊 EPA Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Pollution and Population Health

This section places two independent federal datasets side by side: environmental measurements from the EPA and population-health estimates from the CDC. They describe the same ZIP code but are collected separately, and each one is read on its own terms.

Environmental data — EPA

Local pollution measurements

Air, traffic and contaminated-site indicators for this ZIP code, from EPA programs.

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) Nat. percentile: 10
Diesel exhaust Nat. percentile: 10
Traffic proximity Nat. percentile: 20

Each bar is this ZIP code’s EJScreen national percentile; a higher value means more exposure compared with other U.S. areas.

Air quality (NEI)
An EPA air-quality grade is not available for this ZIP code.
Toxic-release facilities (TRI)
No facilities in this ZIP code report to the EPA Toxics Release Inventory.
Superfund site proximity
Superfund (NPL) sites within 10 km: 0 · nearest about 45.3 mi away
📊 EPA — National Emissions Inventory, EJScreen, Toxics Release Inventory & Superfund (NPL) · Updated 2026 · View source →
AIR EMISSIONS TREND (5-YEAR, EPA AIRDATA)

EPA AirData has insufficient reporting cycles or facilities for Meeker County, MN — trend display held.

EPA AirData methodology

Two independent datasets. Air and soil pollution data (EPA) and health-prevalence data (CDC) are independent datasets shown side by side for context only. ZipCheckup does not establish a causal link between local pollution and any health condition, and these figures do not demonstrate one.

Health data — CDC

Population-health estimates

CDC PLACES modeled prevalence among adults in this ZIP code, each shown with its 95% confidence interval. The prior-release figure is shown alongside as a reference point only; CDC explicitly cautions that small-area year-to-year differences may reflect model recalibration rather than real change.

Adult asthma
Current (2025 release)
10.3%
95% CI 9.2–11.6
Prior (2024 release)
10.6% (95% CI 9.4–11.9)
Within model uncertainty
COPD
Current (2025 release)
7.4%
95% CI 6.4–8.5
Prior (2024 release)
8.3% (95% CI 7.5–9.3)
Within model uncertainty
Cancer
Current (2025 release)
9.2%
95% CI 8.3–10.2
Prior (2024 release)
9% (95% CI 8.2–9.9)
Within model uncertainty

Modeled small-area estimates produced from the BRFSS national survey and census demographics (Zhang et al. 2014). Not direct measurements; not for diagnostic or screening use.

Only CDC PLACES measures present in every release since 2020 appear with a prior-release reference; newer measures (added in 2023 and later) are presented without a prior figure.

CDC PLACES estimates are modeled from the BRFSS national survey and ACS demographics — not direct counts. Year-to-year differences between releases may reflect model recalibration, BRFSS sample-frame changes or census-tract-to-ZIP crosswalk adjustments rather than actual change. Margins of error often exceed annual differences at this geography. Not for diagnostic or screening use.
📊 CDC PLACES — modeled small-area health estimates (current 2025 release, with 2024 prior release shown for reference) · Updated PLACES 2025 · View source →
Food access — USDA

Food access for this area

How the USDA classifies access to grocery stores and fresh food across the surrounding census tract.

USDA access category
High access concern
Food environment index
7.5 of 10 — higher means better access to healthy food
SNAP participation
8.2% of households (USDA estimate)

USDA Food Access Research Atlas tract estimates, mapped from census tract to ZIP code. These are modeled population-level figures, not findings about any individual or any specific address.

📊 USDA — Food Access Research Atlas · Updated FARA 2019 · View source →

Pollution–Health Comparison Index

Limited air-quality data

In 56228, the CDC models adult-asthma prevalence at 10.3%, while a statistical model of local pollution and poverty predicts about 11.3% — below the model’s prediction.

Below predicted Above predicted

Among U.S. ZIP codes, this one sits at percentile 22 for how far observed asthma is above or below the model’s prediction.

Model fit (R²): 0.1601  how much of the variation in asthma the model accounts for; a lower value means a weaker fit and a less reliable comparison.

The Pollution–Health Comparison Index is a percentile rank showing how this ZIP code’s observed asthma prevalence compares with what a statistical model would predict from local pollution and poverty alone. It describes a statistical association, not a cause-and-effect relationship.

The environmental data (EPA) and health-prevalence data (CDC) in this section are independent datasets presented side by side for general informational purposes. Health figures are CDC PLACES modeled estimates with 95% confidence intervals — statistical models, not diagnoses, and they do not describe any individual. ZipCheckup does not establish a causal link between environmental conditions and health outcomes, and nothing in this section is medical advice. For questions about personal health or local environmental conditions, a licensed clinician or a state or local public-health authority is the right source.

Agricultural pesticide use in the surrounding county

USGS estimates how many kilograms of agricultural pesticides are applied each year in this ZIP code’s surrounding county, plus the five most-applied compounds. These are county-level use estimates, not a measurement of any pesticide in the tap water served to this ZIP code.

USGS county-level estimate
151k kg
estimated kilograms of pesticides applied each year across the surrounding county.

Top compounds by volume

The five compounds applied in the largest amounts across this county. Where the EPA sets a drinking-water reference limit (MCL) for a compound, that limit is shown for context — it is a regulatory reference, not a finding of any concentration in this ZIP code’s water.

  • GLYPHOSATE
    Herbicide · 102k kg/yr · EPA drinking-water reference limit: 700 ppb
    Moderate water concern
  • ACETOCHLOR
    Herbicide · 22.9k kg/yr
    Moderate water concern
  • ALACHLOR
    Herbicide · 6.8k kg/yr · EPA drinking-water reference limit: 2 ppb
    High water concern
  • METOLACHLOR
    Herbicide · 5.9k kg/yr
    High water concern
  • ATRAZINE
    Herbicide · 2.7k kg/yr · EPA drinking-water reference limit: 3 ppb
    High water concern

5 of the top compounds are ones the EPA flags for drinking-water monitoring — see the drinking-water section above

What this means

  • These figures describe pesticide application across the surrounding county, not the drinking water at this address.
  • An EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) is a regulatory reference for how much of a compound is allowed in finished tap water — it is not a finding of contamination at this ZIP code.
  • Tested drinking-water results from the local water system — when reported — appear in the drinking-water section of this report.

Methodology: Annual county pesticide-use estimates are from the USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project, mapped from county FIPS to ZIP code. EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels are reproduced from federal drinking-water regulations and are reference points only.

Informational only. County-level agricultural pesticide-use estimates are not a measurement of any pesticide in the drinking water served by this ZIP code, nor an assessment of health risk. Tested drinking-water results, when reported by the local water system, appear in the drinking-water section above.

📊 USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project · Updated May 2026
Home & Infrastructure (8) HIGH

Home Buyer Risk Report

An inspection-grade snapshot of public-data risk factors for this ZIP, built to help a buyer decide what to verify before closing.

49/100
Home Purchase Risk Score
Moderate Risk

Public federal data shows a moderate risk profile for this ZIP. Several factors below are worth verifying independently before closing.

Seven-factor inspection checklist

Each factor below is scored 0–100 from public federal data. A higher score means the factor is more worth verifying before you buy.

Water quality · 25% of score

The local water system's recent EPA violation and contaminant history, along with an independent tap-water test, gives more context.

Worth a look
Flood · 20% of score

The FEMA flood zone, whether the property has flooded before, and flood-insurance requirements are key points to review.

No flag
Lead · 15% of score

Homes built before 1986 may have lead pipes or solder, and pre-1978 homes may have lead paint — a lead inspection adds clarity.

Test recommended
Energy · 15% of score

Heating and cooling costs and the age of the HVAC system, along with recent utility bills, give a fuller picture.

No flag
Housing age · 10% of score

Older homes more often have aging plumbing, wiring, and a water heater near end of life — a full inspection adds detail.

Test recommended
Radon · 10% of score

The EPA recommends testing every home for radon; homes in EPA Radon Zone 1 have the highest potential.

Test recommended

Nearby hazards

Superfund proximity

No EPA Superfund (National Priorities List) sites recorded within 10 km.

ATSDR public-health assessment for nearby sites: No Apparent Public Health Hazard.

95%

Modeled probability of a local water-service disruption in the next 90 days.

See the 90-day disruption outlook
Nuclear plant proximity

Nearest nuclear plant: Monticello, about 49 miles away.

Healthcare access

Hospitals reported by CMS Hospital Compare near this ZIP code, with overall federal quality star ratings where CMS publishes one.

1
hospital within 15 miles
1
with an emergency department

Closest hospitals

  • Meeker Memorial Hospital
    Critical access · 14.3 mi away · ER
    Not rated by CMS

CMS does not publish an average overall quality star rating for the rated set near this ZIP code.

Federal data from CMS Hospital Compare. Distances are straight-line estimates from the ZIP code centroid; ZipCheckup neither ranks nor recommends any hospital.

Inspection-day checklist

Practical items to raise with your inspector, agent, or the seller — tailored to this ZIP's data.

  • Test for radon before closing — the EPA recommends it, especially in Radon Zone 1.
  • Get a lead inspection — homes built before 1978 may contain lead paint and pre-1986 homes may have lead pipes or solder.
  • Ask the age of the water heater and look for signs of corrosion or leaks.
  • Have the electrical panel and wiring inspected — older systems may need updating.
  • Review the local water system's recent disruption and violation history with the utility.
  • Hire an independent home inspector for a full walkthrough of the property.
  • Read the seller's disclosure and any past inspection or repair records.
  • Ask for service records for the HVAC system, water heater, and roof.

What this means

  • This report consolidates seven home-purchase risk factors and nearby hazards from public federal data into one place.
  • Each flagged item is a recommendation to verify independently — not a finding of a defect.
  • An independent home inspection remains an essential step before closing.

Buying or inspecting a home in this area? — talk to a local expert.

Call (844) 439-2761

This is a free service. You will be connected with an independent service provider. We may receive compensation.

Methodology: The report combines the home purchase risk score — a seven-factor composite of public federal data — with EPA Superfund, ATSDR, water-disruption, and NRC nuclear-zone proximity datasets. All figures are modeled estimates.

Informational only. This is a modeled summary of public federal data, not a home inspection, an appraisal, or a prediction of defects. Verify any concern with a qualified inspector before a purchase.

📊 EPA, FEMA, U.S. Census, NRC · Updated May 2026

Housing Profile for 56228

Based on U.S. Census data (ACS B25034), there are 417 housing units in this ZIP code. The median home was built around 1952, making it roughly 74 years old.

Median Home Age
74
years (built ~1952)
Lead Paint Risk
84%
homes built before 1986
Lead Pipe Risk
34%
homes built before 1950

When Homes Were Built

Pre-1940
25% (105)
1940–1949
9% (37)
1950–1959
22% (92)
1960–1969
10% (43)
1970–1979
14% (57)
1980–1989
6% (27)
1990–1999
7% (30)
2000–2009
5% (21)
2010–2019
1% (4)
2020+
0% (1)
Highest risk (pre-1950) Elevated risk (1950–1979) Lower risk (1980+)

What This Means for Home Equipment

Homes built in the 1952s era typically have equipment that has been replaced at least once. Based on typical replacement cycles:

  • Water heater: estimated ~2 years old (avg lifespan: 12 years)
  • HVAC system: estimated ~6 years old (avg lifespan: 17 years)
  • Plumbing: likely Galvanized Steel or Copper — older homes in this ZIP may still have original lead service lines

Home Value Context

Median Home Value
$120,000
46% below state median ($221,000)
Est. Safety Remediation
$1,800
1.5% of median home value

Estimated median home value in this ZIP code based on Census ACS data. Safety remediation costs include water filtration, lead abatement, radon mitigation, and flood insurance where applicable.

📊 Census ACS B25034 · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Equipment Age Estimate for 56228

Based on Census data, the median home in this ZIP was built in 1952 (~74 years old). 84% of homes were built before 1986.

Lead Pipe Risk
High
84% homes pre-1986
Electrical Risk
Elevated
56% homes pre-1970
Water Heater Est. Age
~2 yrs
Avg lifespan: 12 yrs
HVAC Est. Age
~6 yrs
Avg lifespan: 17 yrs
⚠ EPA Lead Pipe Compliance Deadline — Your Utility Must Act

The EPA Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI), finalized October 2024, requires all water utilities to:

  • By October 2027: Complete a lead service line inventory and notify all customers with lead or unknown lines
  • By ~2037: Replace 100% of lead service lines (mandatory 10-year deadline)
  • New action level: Lowered from 15 ppb to 10 ppb — more homes now trigger mandatory action

84% of homes in ZIP 56228 were built before 1986 — the year lead solder was banned. If you receive a notification letter from your water utility, your home likely has lead service lines or lead solder connections.

Recommended actions:
  1. Get your water tested for lead (request a test kit from your utility at no cost)
  2. Install a certified lead-reducing filter (NSF/ANSI 53)
  3. Contact your utility about replacement assistance — costs run $5,000–$15,000, utilities may cover a portion under LCRI
  4. Have a plumber inspect your service line connection

Likely pipe material: Galvanized Steel or Copper

Estimates based on U.S. Census ACS housing vintage data and typical equipment lifespans. Actual conditions vary by home.

Water Infrastructure Risk

54%
High Risk
Estimated pipe failure probability for 56228
State Funding Gap
$796
per resident (20-year need)
Pre-1980 Housing
84%
of homes built before 1980
System Violations
3
EPA violations on record
Lead Indicators
Present
lead service lines likely

Risk Factor Breakdown

Infrastructure Funding Gap 34%
State drinking water infrastructure need relative to population
Housing Vintage 64%
Proportion of homes with plumbing installed before 1980
Violation History 48%
EPA Safe Drinking Water Act violations and enforcement actions
Lead Exposure Risk 71%
Lead service line probability and lead testing results

What This Means

The water infrastructure serving ZIP code 56228 shows multiple risk factors. Most homes in this area were built before 1980, meaning plumbing may contain lead solder or galvanized pipes that corrode over time. Consider testing your tap water, especially if you have an older home.

Aging infrastructure increases the risk of lead, discolored water, and pipe breaks. The EPA recommends that homeowners in areas with older water systems test their tap water annually and consider a Consumer Confidence Report for their water system.
📊 EPA DWINS, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, LCRR · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Infrastructure Decay & Disruption

78
High infrastructure stress
Higher modeled infrastructure stress than 99% of US ZIP codes

Water pipe decay

Local water mains are modeled at or past a critical service threshold.

New 100% of service life consumed End of life
Decay trend
Moderate
Likely pipe material
Galvanized steel or copper
Estimated system age
74 yrs
Modeled failure probability
54%
estimated annual water-main break likelihood

Bridge condition (FHWA NBI)

Bridges in area
63
Rated in poor condition
3.2%
FHWA NBI structural rating
Average bridge age
44 yrs
Worst bridge rating
2/9
FHWA NBI scale — 9 is excellent, 0 is failed

Bridge figures are from the Federal Highway Administration's National Bridge Inventory. They describe area-level structural ratings, not the safety of any specific bridge.

Bridge condition — FHWA NBI 2024 annual release

Of 63 bridges classified within this ZIP code's surrounding county, 3 are classified Poor by FHWA NBI 2024.

Good (32) · Fair (28) · Poor (3)

FHWA classifies bridges as Good (rating 7-9), Fair (5-6), or Poor (0-4) based on biennial inspections of deck, superstructure, substructure, and culvert components.

Counts are county-level aggregated; multiple ZIP codes within the same county share these counts. No per-bridge or per-structure-ID claim is made.

Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory, 2024 annual release.

Gas pipeline incident history

PHMSA records no reported gas-distribution pipeline incidents on file for this area.

Source: U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) historical incident data.

95%

This is the modeled probability of a boil-water advisory or water-service interruption in the next 90 days.

See the full service-disruption breakdown →

What this means

  • This score blends four public federal datasets — water-pipe decay, bridge condition, gas-pipeline incident history, and a 90-day disruption estimate — into one area-level measure of infrastructure stress.
  • It describes the infrastructure around a home, not the condition of the home itself, and it is a modeled estimate rather than an engineering assessment.
  • Aging water mains raise the chance of breaks and service interruptions; a plumber can inspect a home's own supply line and shut-off valve.

Concerned about aging water lines on your property? — talk to a local expert.

Call (855) 384-4856

This is a free service. You will be connected with an independent service provider. We may receive compensation.

Methodology: Water-pipe decay is modeled with an exponential-decay bathtub curve from Census ACS housing age, EPA ECHO compliance records, and EPA infrastructure-needs data. Bridge condition is from the FHWA National Bridge Inventory; gas-pipeline incidents from PHMSA; the 90-day disruption estimate from EPA and FEMA data. The stress score is a weighted composite of these four signals.

All figures are modeled estimates from public federal data. They are not engineering assessments, predictions of failure, or a judgment about any specific structure or utility.

📊 Census ACS, EPA ECHO, FHWA NBI, PHMSA, FEMA · Updated May 2026

HVAC System Health for 56228

Estimated HVAC Age
~6 years
Average lifespan: 17 years
Replacement Status
Good Condition
Likely within reliable service window. Annual maintenance recommended.

Lower electricity rates in Minnesota (14.98¢/kWh) help offset HVAC costs, but an aging system still wastes energy. Modern high-efficiency systems can reduce consumption by 20–40%.

Seasonal HVAC Tips for Minnesota

Fall / Winter
  • Schedule furnace tune-up before first cold snap
  • Replace air filter (every 1–3 months)
  • Check thermostat calibration
  • Insulate exposed ductwork in attic/crawlspace
Year-Round
  • Seal drafts around windows and doors
  • Check carbon monoxide detectors (gas furnace)
  • Schedule bi-annual professional inspection

Common HVAC Issues for 1952-Era Homes

  • Undersized ductwork — older designs often can't handle modern HVAC airflow requirements
  • Poor insulation — pre-1980s homes lose 25–40% more heat through walls and attic
  • Obsolete refrigerant — R-22 (Freon) phased out; repair costs significantly higher
  • Asbestos in duct insulation — homes before 1980 may need professional abatement before HVAC work
Furnace Efficiency Deadline: December 2028

The Department of Energy requires all NEW furnaces manufactured after December 18, 2028 to meet 95% AFUE (condensing furnaces). Current standard is 80% AFUE.

What this means for you:

  • 80% AFUE non-condensing furnaces will no longer be available for purchase
  • Condensing furnaces require PVC venting (additional $1,500–$2,500 for retrofit)
  • If the furnace is approaching end of life, consider replacing before the deadline to potentially save on installation costs
  • Your existing furnace can continue operating — this applies only to NEW equipment

HVAC Questions for 56228

How do I know if my HVAC system needs replacement?

Key signs include: the system is over 15 years old, frequent repairs (more than 2 per year), uneven heating/cooling between rooms, rising energy bills despite normal use, and unusual noises or odors. Based on census data, the median home in 56228 was built in 1952, putting the estimated HVAC system age at ~6 years.

What SEER rating should I look for in a new HVAC system?

As of 2023, the federal minimum is SEER2 15 for central AC in the southern U.S. and SEER2 14 in the north. For Minnesota, look for at least SEER 16–18 for good efficiency. Higher SEER ratings (20+) cost more upfront but save more in areas with high electricity rates. ENERGY STAR certified units are a reliable starting point.

How much does HVAC replacement cost in Minnesota?

A full HVAC replacement (furnace + AC) typically ranges from $5,000–$12,000 depending on system size, efficiency rating, and ductwork condition. Heat pump systems range from $4,000–$10,000. Federal tax credits (25C) cover up to 30% of the cost for qualifying heat pumps and high-efficiency systems. Check our rebates page for Minnesota-specific incentives.

What refrigerant does my AC use and why does it matter?

If your AC was installed before 2010, it likely uses R-22, which was banned in 2020 and now costs $50–$150/lb. Systems from 2010–2024 typically use R-410A, which is being phased down (AIM Act 2025). New systems use R-454B or R-32. When your current system needs major repair, the refrigerant type significantly affects whether repair or replacement makes more economic sense.

Should I replace my furnace before the 2028 efficiency deadline?

If the furnace in a home is over 15 years old and the area has a cold/moderate climate, planning ahead is wise. After December 2028, only 95% AFUE condensing furnaces will be available. These require PVC venting — retrofitting an older home for PVC can cost $1,500–$2,500 on top of the furnace price. Replacing before the deadline with a standard 80% AFUE unit may be more cost-effective if the venting isn't PVC-ready.

HVAC age estimate based on U.S. Census ACS housing vintage data and a 17-year replacement cycle. Actual system age varies by home.

Appliance Age Estimates for 56228

Median home built in 1952 (~74 years old). Appliance ages estimated from typical replacement cycles.

Water Heater
~2 yrs
Avg lifespan: 12 yrs · $800–$2500
Dishwasher
~2 yrs
Avg lifespan: 12 yrs · $700–$2500
Washing Machine
~2 yrs
Avg lifespan: 12 yrs · $600–$2200
Dryer
~9 yrs
Avg lifespan: 13 yrs · $500–$2000
Refrigerator
~4 yrs
Avg lifespan: 14 yrs · $1000–$4000
Garbage Disposal
~2 yrs
Avg lifespan: 12 yrs · $200–$600

How Water Quality Affects Appliance Lifespan

Water conditions in Cosmos directly impact how long your appliances last.

Hard Water
Mineral buildup (calcium, magnesium) clogs water heaters, dishwashers, and washing machines. Can reduce lifespan by 25–30%.
Sediment & Particulates
Sand and rust particles accelerate wear on valves, seals, and heating elements in water heaters and dishwashers.
High Chlorine
Corrodes rubber gaskets and seals in washing machines and dishwashers, leading to leaks and premature failure.
Low pH (Acidic Water)
Corrodes metal components inside water heaters and garbage disposals, shortening their service life.

Homes built before 1996 have likely gone through 2+ full appliance replacement cycles. If original appliances remain, they are well past expected lifespan.

Appliance Maintenance FAQ

How often should I flush my water heater?

Flush your tank water heater at least once a year to remove sediment buildup. In areas with hard water, every 6 months is recommended. Sediment reduces heating efficiency and accelerates tank corrosion, shortening lifespan by 2–4 years.

When should I replace my dishwasher vs. repair it?

If your dishwasher is over 9 years old and the repair costs more than 50% of a new unit, replacement is generally more cost-effective. Common signs: dishes not getting clean, water pooling after cycles, or rust spots on the interior.

Does a water softener really extend appliance life?

Yes. A water softener can extend water heater lifespan by up to 30% and reduce dishwasher and washing machine maintenance by preventing mineral scale buildup on heating elements, valves, and spray arms. The Battelle Memorial Institute found that softened water kept water heaters at original factory efficiency over a 15-year period.

Estimates based on U.S. Census housing vintage data and manufacturer-average replacement cycles. Actual appliance age depends on renovation history and maintenance.

Electrical Safety for 56228

Median home built in 1952 (~74 years old). 56% of homes were built before 1970, when electrical standards were significantly different.

Electrical Risk Level
Elevated
56% homes pre-1970
Est. Panel Age
~14 yrs
Avg lifespan: 25–40 yrs

Common Electrical Issues for 1952-Era Homes

  • Knob-and-tube wiring — common in pre-1950 homes, lacks grounding and cannot safely handle modern electrical loads
  • Undersized electrical panel — 60–100 amp panels typical of this era cannot support today's appliances, EV chargers, or HVAC systems
  • Aluminum wiring — used in 1960s–1970s homes, poses fire risk at connections due to oxidation and thermal expansion
  • Ungrounded outlets — two-prong outlets indicate missing ground wire, increasing shock and surge risk
  • Federal Pacific / Zinsco panels — common in 1960s–1980s homes, known for breaker failure; replacement strongly recommended

⚠️ Insurance Compliance Alert

84% of homes in 56228 were built before 1986 — the era when Federal Pacific (FPE StabLok), Zinsco, and Challenger electrical panels were commonly installed.

These panels have a documented 60%+ breaker failure rate and are refused by major insurance companies including State Farm, Allstate, and Citizens (FL).

If you receive an insurance non-renewal notice or 4-point inspection failure:

  • Typical deadline: 30 days to replace panel
  • Replacement cost: $1,500–$4,000
  • Failure to replace: insurance cancellation → mortgage default risk

Insurance blacklist: State Farm, Farmers, Allstate, USAA, Mercury, Citizens (FL), Nationwide.

When to Call an Electrician

Urgent Signs
  • Burning smell from outlets or panel
  • Frequent breaker trips
  • Sparking or discolored outlets
  • Buzzing sounds from wiring or panel
Recommended Inspections
  • Before buying a home (especially pre-1980)
  • After any water damage or flooding
  • Before adding major appliances or EV charger
  • If your panel is 25+ years old

Electrical Safety Tips

Panel & Wiring
  • Never use a fuse with a higher amperage rating than the circuit is designed for
  • Label all breakers clearly in your electrical panel
  • Keep 3 feet of clearance in front of your electrical panel
Around the Home
  • Test GFCI outlets monthly using the built-in test button
  • Replace any cracked or warm outlet covers immediately
  • Do not daisy-chain power strips or extension cords

Homes built before 1976 likely have outdated wiring and panels that do not meet current electrical codes. A professional electrical inspection is strongly recommended.

Electrical Safety Questions for 56228

How do I know if my electrical panel needs an upgrade?

Key signs include: frequent breaker trips, a panel over 25 years old, fuses instead of circuit breakers, visible rust or corrosion, and a panel rated below 200 amps if you have modern appliances, HVAC, or an EV charger. Based on census data, the median home in 56228 was built in 1952 — homes of this age often have panels that don't meet current electrical demands.

How much does an electrical panel upgrade cost?

A panel upgrade from 100 to 200 amps typically costs $1,500–$4,000 depending on your location and the complexity of the work. If the meter base or service entrance also needs replacement, costs can reach $4,000–$6,000. Rewiring a full home (common in pre-1960 homes) ranges from $8,000–$15,000+ depending on size and accessibility.

Is aluminum wiring dangerous?

Aluminum wiring itself is not inherently dangerous, but connections between aluminum wiring and copper devices (outlets, switches) can overheat due to differential thermal expansion. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) found that homes with aluminum wiring are 55 times more likely to have fire-hazard conditions. If your home has aluminum wiring, a qualified electrician can install COPALUM or AlumiConn connectors to make connections safe.

Is my home likely to have a Federal Pacific or Zinsco panel?

These panels were installed primarily between 1960 and 1985. Based on census data, 84% of homes in 56228 were built during this era. If your home was built in this period and the panel has never been replaced, there is a meaningful chance it contains an FPE StabLok or Zinsco panel. Look for the brand name on your breaker panel door.

Electrical risk assessment based on U.S. Census ACS housing vintage data. Actual wiring and panel condition varies by home and renovation history.

Septic System Requirements in Minnesota

ℹ Partial Requirements Apply
Disclosure mandatory; inspection mandatory for bedroom additions

Disclosure of system status required at sale. Full inspection required when adding bedrooms or increasing flow.

Typical Inspection Cost
$300 – $600
Based on Minnesota market rates
Consequence of Non-Compliance

Non-compliant systems must be upgraded. Counties may require compliance inspection at sale.

Legal Reference: Minn. Stat. §115.55; MPCA SSTS Rules

What Homeowners Should Know

  • Approximately 1 in 5 U.S. households relies on a septic system for wastewater treatment.
  • Regular pumping every 3–5 years is recommended by the EPA to prevent system failure.
  • A failed septic system can cost $7,000–$15,000 or more to replace, depending on system type and soil conditions.
  • If you are selling a property in Minnesota, check your state and local requirements before listing.
  • Signs of septic failure include slow drains, sewage odors, and standing water near the drain field.

Source: Minnesota environmental and health department regulations. Cost estimates reflect typical market rates and may vary by provider, system size, and location. This information is for general guidance only—contact your local health department for requirements specific to your property.

CO & Gas Safety Profile

0
Low Gas Risk
PHMSA gas distribution incident risk score for 56228
County Incidents
0
gas distribution incidents since 2004
Fatalities
0
no deaths reported
Risk Level
Low
based on incident history
RISK SCORE 0/100
0 — Safe 100 — Highest Risk

CO & Gas Safety Tips

  • Install CO detectors on every level of your home and near sleeping areas. Replace batteries annually and units every 5-7 years.
  • Know gas leak signs: rotten egg smell, hissing sounds near gas lines, dead vegetation near pipelines, bubbling in standing water.
  • Annual inspection: have a licensed technician inspect gas appliances (furnace, water heater, stove) every year.
  • Emergency: if you smell gas, leave immediately, do not use electrical switches, and call 911 or your gas company from outside.

Protect Your Home from Carbon Monoxide

The CPSC recommends a CO detector on every level. Battery-operated models start at $20. Smart detectors with app alerts start at $35.

Product link may earn a commission — see our disclosure.

📊 PHMSA Gas Distribution Incidents · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Remodeling Permit Requirements in Minnesota

⚠ Strict Permit Enforcement
What Requires a Permit

Structural, electrical, plumbing, mechanical. Minnesota State Building Code applies uniformly statewide.

Typical Permit Cost
$100 – $2500
Based on Minnesota fee schedules
Penalty for Non-Compliance

Fines up to $2,000, stop-work orders, mandatory correction, misdemeanor

Legal Reference: Minn. Stat. §326B; Minnesota State Building Code

Why This Matters

  • Unpermitted work can reduce your home's appraised value by 10–20% and complicate or block a sale entirely.
  • Homeowner insurance may deny claims for damage caused by or related to unpermitted renovations.
  • Buyers' lenders may require proof of permits before approving a mortgage, especially for kitchens, bathrooms, and structural changes.
  • Unpermitted electrical and plumbing work is a leading cause of house fires and water damage — permits exist to ensure safety inspections.
  • If you are planning remodeling work in Minnesota, contact your local building department before starting any project that alters structure, electrical, plumbing, or mechanical systems.

Remodeling Permit Questions for 56228

What remodeling work requires a permit in Minnesota?

In Minnesota, permits are generally required for any work that alters the structure, electrical wiring, plumbing, or mechanical systems of a home. This includes kitchen and bathroom renovations involving plumbing or electrical changes, wall removal, room additions, window enlargements, re-roofing, and HVAC replacement. Purely cosmetic work — painting, flooring, cabinet refacing without plumbing changes — typically does not require a permit. Always check with your local building department, as municipal requirements may be stricter than state minimums.

What happens if I remodel without a permit in Minnesota?

Working without a required permit in Minnesota can result in Fines up to $2,000, stop-work orders, mandatory correction, misdemeanor. Beyond legal penalties, unpermitted work creates problems when selling: buyers' home inspectors and appraisers flag unpermitted additions, lenders may refuse financing, and title companies may require permits to be obtained retroactively — often at 2–3 times the original permit fee. In serious cases, you may be required to open walls for inspection or demolish non-compliant work.

How much does a remodeling permit cost in Minnesota?

Remodeling permit fees in Minnesota typically range from $100 to $2500, depending on the scope and value of the project. Most jurisdictions calculate fees as a percentage of the project's estimated construction cost (usually 1–2%) or use a flat fee schedule based on project type. Electrical and plumbing sub-permits may be billed separately. Contact your local building department for an exact fee quote before starting work.

Permit requirements based on Minnesota building codes and ICC adoption data. Costs reflect typical municipal fee schedules and may vary by jurisdiction, project scope, and valuation. This information is for general guidance only — contact your local building department for requirements specific to your project.

Home maintenance concerns detected — talk to a local expert.

Call (855) 384-4856

This is a free service. You will be connected with an independent service provider. We may receive compensation.

Cost & Community (5) OK

True Cost of Ownership

$1,020
estimated extra annual cost vs a median-risk US ZIP
Higher modeled annual risk-cost than 46% of US ZIP codes

How this ZIP compares

US median ZIP
$1,200
per year
MN median
$1,070
per year

Where the estimate comes from

Energy-code gap$540
Lead & water safety$400
Underground storage tanks$80

5-year equipment outlook

No major equipment is flagged for likely replacement within five years.

What this means

  • This is a modeled estimate of how much more — or less — a household here may spend each year on risk-related costs such as insurance, mitigation, testing, and maintenance, compared with a typical US ZIP.
  • It is a comparison figure for context, not a bill, a quote, or financial advice.
  • The 5-year equipment ranges above are separate one-time replacements, not part of the annual figure.

Methodology: Each of 13 risk verticals is assigned a dollar figure from public federal data; the total is the modeled annual difference from a median-risk US ZIP. The 5-year equipment outlook flags major home equipment whose estimated age is within five years of its typical service life; figures are national-average installed-cost ranges.

Estimates are modeled from public federal data. They are not quotes, prices, or financial or insurance advice.

Tax Burden in Minnesota

State tax rates affect cost of ownership. Here's how Minnesota compares to national averages.

Income Tax
9.8%
top marginal rate
US avg: 5.3%
Sales Tax
8.9%
combined avg
US avg: 6.6%
Property Tax
1.05%
effective rate
US avg: 0.98%
Sales Tax Breakdown
State rate: 6.88%
Avg local add-on: 2.02%

Source: Tax Foundation 2024. Income tax = top marginal rate. Sales tax = state + avg local. Property tax = effective rate on home value.

Energy Costs in Minnesota

Residential electricity rate: 14.98¢/kWh12% below the national average (national avg: 17.0¢/kWh · EIA, December 2025)

Minnesota Energy Mix

Solar 5.2% Wind 25.2% Hydro 1.5% Nuclear 21.7% Gas 20.8% Coal 23.2%
Renewable energy
31.9%
Clean energy (incl. nuclear)
53.6%

Source: EIA Form 923, 2025 data. Renewable = solar + wind + hydro + geothermal.

📊 EIA + Census ACS · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Electric Utility for 56228

Provider
Northern States Power Co - Minnesota
Investor Owned
Residential Rate
17.0¢/kWh
State avg: 15.0¢/kWh

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861 (2024 data). EIA ID: 13781.

Home Energy Audit for 56228

IRA Energy Incentives Are Time-Limited

The Inflation Reduction Act provides up to $8,000 in rebates and $3,200 in annual tax credits for home energy upgrades — but many provisions phase down or expire after 2032. A professional energy audit is the first step to qualifying for these incentives. Homes in 56228 average ~74 years old, making energy audits especially impactful.

Electricity Rate
17.0¢/kWh
State avg: 15.0¢/kWh (12% below U.S. avg)
Est. Annual Energy Cost
$1,573
based on avg U.S. household (10,500 kWh/yr)
Renewable Energy
32%
of Minnesota's electricity from renewables
Potential Annual Savings
$236–$472
15–30% savings from energy audit

What a Home Energy Audit Covers

Thermal Envelope
  • Insulation levels in attic, walls, and basement
  • Air leaks around windows, doors, and ducts
  • Blower door test (measures total air leakage)
Equipment & Systems
  • HVAC efficiency and age assessment
  • Water heater type and condition
  • Lighting and appliance energy use
Safety Checks
  • Carbon monoxide and combustion safety
  • Moisture and ventilation assessment
  • Gas leak detection
Deliverables
  • Prioritized list of recommended upgrades
  • Estimated cost and savings for each upgrade
  • Rebate and tax credit eligibility report
Potential Savings from an Energy Audit
  • The average home energy audit identifies $200–$400/year in savings (DOE)
  • Properly sealed and insulated homes save 15% on heating and cooling costs (DOE)
  • Heat pump upgrades can reduce heating costs by 30–50% compared to electric resistance
  • ENERGY STAR certified windows save $101–$583/year compared to single-pane windows
  • Weatherization assistance programs are available for income-qualifying households

Homes in 56228 are ~74 years old on average — older homes typically have the most to gain from an energy audit due to outdated insulation, single-pane windows, and aging HVAC systems.

Your Utility: Northern States Power Co - Minnesota

Northern States Power Co - Minnesota (Investor-owned) serves 56228. Your local residential rate is 17.0¢/kWh , which is below the national average — but efficiency upgrades still pay for themselves over time . Many utilities offer additional rebates on top of federal IRA incentives — ask your energy auditor about programs from Northern States Power Co - Minnesota.

Federal & State Incentives
IRA Tax Credits (IRC §25C) — up to $3,200/year
$2,000 — Heat pump / heat pump water heater
$1,600 — Insulation & air sealing
$600 — Windows & doors
$150 — Home energy audit itself
IRA Rebates (HEEHRA — income-qualified)
Up to $8,000 — Heat pump installation
Up to $1,600 — Insulation & air sealing
Up to $2,500 — Electrical panel upgrade
Up to $840 — Heat pump clothes dryer
30% tax credit for solar panels — extended through 2032 under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRC §25D). No annual cap for residential solar.

Under the Inflation Reduction Act. Income limits apply for HEEHRA rebates. Tax credits require tax liability. IRS details →

DOE Home Energy Audit Standards

To claim the $150 federal tax credit, your energy audit must meet DOE standards (10 CFR 440.21) and be performed by a qualified auditor. A DOE-compliant audit includes:

  • Blower door test to measure air infiltration
  • Infrared thermography to identify insulation gaps
  • Combustion safety testing for gas appliances
  • Written report with prioritized, cost-effective upgrade recommendations

Energy Audit Questions for 56228

How much does a home energy audit cost?

A professional home energy audit typically costs $150–$400 depending on the size of your home and the depth of testing. The Inflation Reduction Act provides a $150 tax credit for qualifying audits performed by a certified auditor, effectively covering a significant portion of the audit cost. Some utilities also subsidize audits for their customers — check with Northern States Power Co - Minnesota for local programs.

What is the difference between an energy audit and a home inspection?

A home inspection (done during a home sale) evaluates structural and safety conditions. An energy audit specifically measures how your home uses energy and identifies efficiency improvements. Energy audits use specialized tools like blower doors, infrared cameras, and duct blasters that are not part of a standard home inspection. The audit produces a prioritized list of upgrades with estimated costs and savings.

How much can I save after an energy audit?

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the average audit identifies $200–$400/year in savings. Actual savings depend on your home's age, current insulation, HVAC efficiency, and local energy rates. At current rates in Minnesota, the average home spends approximately $1,573/year on electricity — a 15–25% reduction through audit-recommended upgrades could save $236–$393 annually. With homes in 56228 averaging ~74 years old, there is likely significant potential for improvement.

What rebates and tax credits are available for energy upgrades?

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provides two types of incentives: (1) Tax credits up to $3,200/year for heat pumps ($2,000), insulation ($1,600), windows ($600), and the audit itself ($150); and (2) HEEHRA rebates for income-qualifying households — up to $8,000 for heat pumps, $1,600 for insulation, $2,500 for electrical panels, and $840 for heat pump dryers. Solar panels qualify for a separate 30% tax credit through 2032.

Do I need an energy audit before installing solar panels?

An energy audit is not legally required before installing solar, but the DOE strongly recommends it. Reducing your home's energy consumption before adding solar means you need a smaller (cheaper) system to cover your needs. An audit typically identifies 15–30% in energy reductions through insulation, air sealing, and HVAC improvements — which directly reduces the size and cost of a solar installation.

How long does a home energy audit take?

A comprehensive energy audit takes 2–4 hours for a typical single-family home. The auditor will inspect the attic, basement, walls, windows, HVAC system, water heater, and ductwork. Diagnostic tests (blower door, infrared scan) add precision to the findings. You will receive a written report within 1–2 weeks with prioritized recommendations and estimated costs.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169).

Safety Updates for Cosmos, Minnesota

Elevated lead levels detected
Lead measured at 5 ppb (EPA action level: 15 ppb). 4 health violations on record. Population affected: 513.

Violations & Enforcement Timeline

2023-03-06 State Order Extension
2022-02-28 State Informal Action
2022-02-14 State Filed Suit
2021-11-05 State Informal Action
2021-11-05 State Informal Action
View all 13 records
2021-11-05 State Informal Enforcement
2021-10-01 MCL Arsenic Resolved 0.0208 MG/L
2021-09-24 State Informal Action
2021-09-24 State Informal Action
2021-09-24 State Informal Enforcement
2021-08-17 State Informal Action
2021-07-01 MCL Arsenic Resolved 0.0253 MG/L
2021-04-01 MCL Arsenic Resolved 0.023 MG/L

National safety news feed →

📊 EPA ECHO · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Recent Product Recalls

Recent CPSC recalls for plumbing and HVAC products that may affect homes in your area.

Superbobi 7 3/8 Inch Pool Drain Covers
Shenzhen Jiangtou Technology Co. · 2026-05-14

Electric Kettles (ENFINIGY 1.5 l and ENFINIGY Pro 1.5 l)
ZWILLING J. A. Henckels Aktiengesellschaft · 2026-05-14

Electric Start Pressure Washers
Generac Power Systems Expands · 2026-05-14

1-K Kerosene Heater Fluid Portable Fuel Containers
Alliance Chemical · 2026-04-30

View all recalls →

📊 CPSC · Updated March 2026 · View source →

Protect Your Home in Cosmos

Based on local data for ZIP 56228, these services may benefit homeowners in your area.

Based on local data for your area. Use the tools below to explore your options.

Gutter Installation & Repair

Homes in 56228 were built around 1952 on average. Aging gutters can cause foundation damage, basement flooding, and mold — a professional assessment can prevent costly repairs.

Typical cost: Gutter installation: typically $1,000–$2,500 for a standard home

Estimate Your Home Maintenance Costs

Window Replacement

With a median build year of 1952, many homes in Cosmos likely have original or outdated windows. ENERGY STAR windows can save $101–$583/year on energy bills.

Typical cost: Window replacement: typically $300–$800 per window installed

Estimate Your Home Maintenance Costs

Roofing Inspection & Repair

Homes built around 1952 may be on their second or third roof. A professional inspection can catch damage before leaks start.

Typical cost: Roof inspection: typically $75–$300; repairs $300–$1,500

Estimate Your Home Insurance Needs

Service recommendations are based on public data for this ZIP code (FEMA, Census ACS, NWS). Actual needs vary by property. By calling, your information will be shared with an independent service provider. ZipCheckup may receive compensation. Cost estimates are approximate and vary by property, condition, and contractor.

Take Action

Concerned about these findings? Contact your local elected officials to ask what is being done about water quality in your area.

Email Your Representative

Don't know who to contact? Find your local representative at usa.gov/elected-officials

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the tap water in 56228 safe to drink?

Based on EPA SDWIS data, Cosmos's primary water system (Cosmos) has 4 recorded violations in the past 5 years, including 4 health-based. Check the full report above for details.

Where does 56228's water come from?

The primary water source for ZIP code 56228 is Groundwater. Cosmos serves approximately 513 people.

How can I get my water tested in Cosmos?

Contact your local water utility (Cosmos) for a free Consumer Confidence Report, or hire a certified lab for independent home water testing. The EPA recommends annual testing if you use a private well.

Is lead a concern in 56228 tap water?

The most recent lead sampling for 56228 recorded 0.005 mg/L. The EPA action level is 0.015 mg/L. This result is below the EPA action level.

What is the radon risk for 56228?

56228 falls in EPA Radon Zone 1 (High risk), located in Meeker County. Zone 1 indicates the highest radon potential. Testing your home is recommended regardless of zone.

What contaminants were found in ZIP 56228 water?

According to the most recent Consumer Confidence Report, 10 contaminants were detected. The top contaminants include Lead (500 ppb, exceeds MCL), Arsenic (6.49 ppb). See the full water quality breakdown above.

Nearby ZIP Code Reports

Water quality comparison for ZIP codes near 56228

ZIP Code City, State Distance Grade Violations
56253 Lake Lillian, MN 10.0 mi D 19
56209 Atwater, MN 11.5 mi C 0
56243 Grove City, MN 13.4 mi C 0
55314 Buffalo Lake, MN 14.0 mi C 1
55355 Litchfield, MN 14.3 mi B 0
55342 Hector, MN 14.6 mi B 0
55350 Hutchinson, MN 16.0 mi B 0
55324 Darwin, MN 16.6 mi C 1
56251 Kandiyohi, MN 16.6 mi B 0
55310 Bird Island, MN 16.7 mi C 0

Contaminants Detected in 56228

Learn more about the contaminants found in your water supply:

Overall safety breakdown

Home Safety Score →

Find the right water filter

Water Filter Matcher →

Compare filters, tests & services

Compare My Options →

Compare with another ZIP

Compare Tool →
Coverage: 14/17 risk factors Data sources →
Get alerts for 56228