2026 Rankings

Worst Infrastructure: Mississippi — 2026 Rankings

Last updated: July 19, 2026

517 ZIP codes ranked by Pipe Failure Risk #1: ZIP 39210 (Jackson, MS) - 74%

Out of 517 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in Mississippi, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 517
Highest risk 74%
Median risk 36%
Average risk 37%
State Mississippi

Top 100 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 39210 Jackson MS 74% Very High 66/100
2 39115 Midnight MS 62% Very High 66/100
3 39202 Jackson MS 62% Very High 60/100
4 38723 Avon MS 60% High 73/100
5 39213 Jackson MS 60% High 55/100
6 39174 Tougaloo MS 59% High 91/100
7 39203 Jackson MS 59% High 65/100
8 38614 Clarksdale MS 58% High 68/100
9 39204 Jackson MS 58% High 60/100
10 39206 Jackson MS 58% High 55/100
11 39209 Jackson MS 58% High 55/100
12 39216 Jackson MS 57% High 60/100
13 38963 Tutwiler MS 56% High 68/100
14 39212 Jackson MS 56% High 55/100
15 38772 Scott MS 55% High 89/100
16 39211 Jackson MS 55% High 50/100
17 38646 Marks MS 53% High 75/100
18 38737 Drew MS 51% High 86/100
19 39205 Jackson MS 51% High 65/100
20 39207 Jackson MS 51% High 65/100
21 39215 Jackson MS 51% High 65/100
22 39225 Jackson MS 51% High 70/100
23 39235 Jackson MS 51% High 66/100
24 39236 Jackson MS 51% High 65/100
25 39250 Jackson MS 51% High 70/100
26 39269 Jackson MS 51% High 70/100
27 39271 Jackson MS 51% High 66/100
28 39282 Jackson MS 51% High 70/100
29 39283 Jackson MS 51% High 66/100
30 39284 Jackson MS 51% High 65/100
31 39286 Jackson MS 51% High 65/100
32 39289 Jackson MS 51% High 70/100
33 39296 Jackson MS 51% High 65/100
34 39298 Jackson MS 51% High 66/100
35 39406 Hattiesburg MS 51% High 71/100
36 39477 Sandersville MS 51% High 85/100
37 38721 Anguilla MS 50% High 69/100
38 38725 Benoit MS 50% High 79/100
39 38967 Winona MS 50% High 97/100
40 39193 Whitfield MS 50% High 89/100
41 38643 Lambert MS 49% High 88/100
42 39120 Natchez MS 49% High 81/100
43 39201 Jackson MS 49% High 55/100
44 39363 Stonewall MS 49% High 88/100
45 39563 Moss Point MS 49% High 73/100
46 38730 Boyle MS 48% High 80/100
47 38962 Tippo MS 48% High 66/100
48 39056 Clinton MS 48% High 85/100
49 39111 Magee MS 48% High 63/100
50 39352 Porterville MS 48% High 98/100
51 39567 Pascagoula MS 48% High 73/100
52 38701 Greenville MS 47% High 78/100
53 38703 Greenville MS 47% High 73/100
54 38753 Inverness MS 47% High 94/100
55 38760 Metcalfe MS 47% High 94/100
56 38767 Rena Lara MS 47% High 89/100
57 38928 Glendora MS 47% High 90/100
58 39041 Bolton MS 47% High 89/100
59 39062 D Lo MS 47% High 65/100
60 39078 Georgetown MS 47% High 65/100
61 39630 Bude MS 47% High 89/100
62 39635 Fernwood MS 47% High 73/100
63 39648 Mccomb MS 47% High 82/100
64 38621 Crenshaw MS 46% High 94/100
65 38762 Mound Bayou MS 46% High 89/100
66 38774 Shelby MS 46% High 94/100
67 38921 Charleston MS 46% High 76/100
68 38950 Philipp MS 46% High 93/100
69 39153 Raleigh MS 46% High 75/100
70 39154 Raymond MS 46% High 88/100
71 39162 Satartia MS 46% High 86/100
72 39581 Pascagoula MS 46% High 73/100
73 39653 Meadville MS 46% High 93/100
74 39668 Union Church MS 46% High 93/100
75 38645 Lyon MS 45% High 89/100
76 38746 Gunnison MS 45% High 77/100
77 38751 Indianola MS 45% High 86/100
78 38771 Ruleville MS 45% High 89/100
79 38864 Randolph MS 45% High 79/100
80 39114 Mendenhall MS 45% High 83/100
81 39116 Mize MS 45% High 87/100
82 39177 Valley Park MS 45% High 60/100
83 39367 Waynesboro MS 45% High 85/100
84 39461 Neely MS 45% High 93/100
85 39652 Magnolia MS 45% High 83/100
86 39701 Columbus MS 45% High 60/100
87 38738 Parchman MS 44% High 85/100
88 38765 Panther Burn MS 44% High 66/100
89 39073 Florence MS 44% High 65/100
90 39208 Pearl MS 44% High 79/100
91 39501 Gulfport MS 44% High 73/100
92 38623 Darling MS 43% High 94/100
93 38745 Grace MS 43% High 73/100
94 38756 Leland MS 43% High 83/100
95 38843 Fulton MS 43% High 98/100
96 38920 Cascilla MS 43% High 73/100
97 39071 Flora MS 43% High 83/100
98 39156 Redwood MS 43% High 60/100
99 39159 Rolling Fork MS 43% High 79/100
100 39328 De Kalb MS 43% High 66/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-07-19.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

How this ranking is calculated, data sources, and limitations: Rankings Methodology →


Related Rankings

Water Safety 2026 EPA violations and water quality scores Lead Risk 2026 Lead pipe infrastructure and EPA exceedances Infrastructure 2026 Aging pipes, system age and remediation costs
Disclaimer: Rankings are based on EPA, FEMA, and federal agency data. They reflect historical patterns and risk indicators, not necessarily current conditions. For the most current information, contact your local water utility or request a Consumer Confidence Report.

Get safety alerts for Mississippi

Free updates when EPA data changes for this area. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy.

Share This Page

X Facebook
Check your water filter options Free tool - no phone call required.