State of Home Safety 2026

A data-driven assessment of residential environmental risk across 41,344 U.S. ZIP codes

Published April 3, 2026 · Data through 2026-04-03 · 63 data sources · CC BY 4.0

1. Executive Summary

67/100 National Score (Grade C)
41,344 ZIP Codes Analyzed
23,861 Anomalies Detected
$1,020 Median Hidden Annual Cost

The United States earns a grade of C for residential home safety in 2026, with a national average score of 67 out of 100. This assessment is based on analysis of 41,344 ZIP codes across all 51 states and the District of Columbia, drawing on 63 federal and state data sources covering 17 environmental risk categories.

No state achieved an A grade. 20 states earned a B; the remaining 31 received a C. At the ZIP code level, 10,053 communities (24.3%) scored a D or F.

Key Findings

  • National average Home Safety Score: 67/100 (Grade C)
  • 10053 ZIP codes (24.3%) received a D or F grade
  • 23,861 anomalies detected across 42,680 ZIP codes
  • 1,154 ZIP codes show accelerating infrastructure decay
  • Median hidden annual cost of environmental risk: $1,020 per household
  • 2,466 ZIP codes scored 70+ on lead exposure risk
  • 1022 PFAS contamination clusters identified
  • 3,512 ZIP codes face high or very high wildfire risk

2. State-by-State Rankings

States are ranked by average Home Safety Score, a weighted composite of 17 risk verticals computed for every residential ZIP code in the state.

Top 10 Safest States

# State Score Grade ZIP Codes % with Violations
1 Texas 82 B 2,649 79%
2 Delaware 81 B 97 68%
3 Mississippi 81 B 532 79%
4 Nevada 81 B 254 75%
5 Hawaii 79 B 137 7%
6 Oklahoma 79 B 771 82%
7 Oregon 78 B 482 72%
8 South Carolina 78 B 534 41%
9 Washington 78 B 726 60%
10 Arkansas 76 B 706 36%

Bottom 10 States

# State Score Grade ZIP Codes % with Violations
51 Wyoming 55 C 195 58%
50 Pennsylvania 55 C 2,184 48%
49 Montana 55 C 405 52%
48 North Dakota 56 C 407 29%
47 Maine 57 C 485 43%
46 New Jersey 58 C 726 40%
45 Iowa 59 C 1,058 45%
44 South Dakota 60 C 392 35%
43 Ohio 60 C 1,435 53%
42 Indiana 60 C 980 64%

Grade Distribution (ZIP Codes)

A
5,723 (13.8%)
B
12,014 (29.1%)
C
13,554 (32.8%)
D
9,438 (22.8%)
F
615 (1.5%)

3. Water Quality Findings

34 out of 51 states have a majority of ZIP codes with at least one recorded drinking water violation. The national average violation rate across states is 55.7%.

Lead Exposure

Of the 32,959 ZIP codes assessed for lead risk, 2,466 scored 70 or above on the lead exposure index (scale 0–100). The national average lead score is 50. Lead risk is determined by water lead levels, pre-1986 housing stock, service line probability, and CDC blood lead surveillance data.

19,551 ZIP codes — High risk
2,061 ZIP codes — Very High risk
10,124 ZIP codes — Moderate risk
1,223 ZIP codes — Low risk

PFAS (Forever Chemicals)

12,863 ZIP codes have PFAS-related data from EPA ECHO and Superfund records. ZipCheckup's anomaly detection identified 1,022 PFAS contamination clusters — groups of geographically adjacent ZIP codes with concurrent PFAS exceedances, suggesting shared contamination sources such as industrial sites, military bases, or wastewater facilities.

Silent Danger Zones

616 ZIP codes have elevated contaminant levels or health-based violations with zero corresponding enforcement actions. These "silent danger" zones represent gaps in regulatory follow-through — areas where residents face documented water quality issues that remain unaddressed by federal or state enforcement.

Enforcement Activity

5,084 ZIP codes experienced enforcement spikes — sudden increases in EPA or state enforcement actions. This may indicate newly discovered contamination, overdue regulatory attention, or worsening infrastructure conditions.

4. Infrastructure & Natural Hazard Findings

Infrastructure Decay

Water and utility infrastructure was assessed for 38,549 ZIP codes. The median infrastructure age is 48 years; the average is 53 years. 17,030 ZIP codes have infrastructure older than 50 years.

1,154 ZIP codes are classified as accelerating decay — meaning failure probability is increasing faster than linear age-based models predict. These communities face elevated risk of pipe breaks, service disruptions, and contamination from corroding infrastructure.

1,154 accelerating
11,610 moderate
19,186 slow
6,599 stable

Flood Risk

FEMA NFIP data covers 26,172 ZIP codes with recorded flood insurance claims. Total historical claims: 2,663,849, with $88,253,960,587 paid out. The average claim payment is $33,130. 3,412 ZIP codes have 100 or more recorded claims.

Wildfire & Smoke

Wildfire risk data covers 42,675 ZIP codes. 3,512 are classified as high or very high wildfire risk by FEMA NRI.

Smoke exposure — measured by a composite of AQI data, wildfire proximity, and county fire history — affects far more communities: 33,283 ZIP codes score 8–10 on the smoke risk index, indicating chronic or recurring elevated particulate exposure.

Housing Age & Lead Correlation

Housing vintage is a critical factor in lead exposure risk. The national breakdown:

Era ZIP Codes Avg Lead Score 100% High Risk
Pre-19401,86070100%
1940s1,39768100%
1950s3,47363100%
1960s4,5166098%
1970s8,8075385%
1980s7,3114339%
1990s4,103303%
2000s1,329221%
2010s159200%
2020s3170%

5. The Hidden Cost of Where You Live

ZipCheckup's Compound Risk Portfolio model estimates the additional annual cost a household incurs from environmental hazards above the national median baseline. This includes estimated expenses for water filtration, flood insurance premiums, wildfire mitigation, radon testing, lead abatement, and other hazard-specific measures across 13 risk verticals.

$1,020 Median Annual Hidden Cost
$1,466 Mean Annual Hidden Cost
$3,370 90th Percentile Cost

Risk Tier Distribution

10,050 high
4,458 very_high
1,158 critical
6,820 low
3,030 minimal
17,159 moderate

1,158 ZIP codes are classified as critical — meaning estimated additional annual costs exceed the national 99th percentile. Residents in these areas face the greatest financial burden from environmental hazards, often compounded by lower median incomes.

6. Anomalies & Outliers

ZipCheckup's automated anomaly detection flagged 23,861 anomalies across 42,680 ZIP codes. Anomalies are patterns that deviate from expected norms — they may indicate unreported contamination, regulatory gaps, or unusual risk concentrations.

Anomaly Types

Type Count Description
score contradiction11,531Component scores diverge significantly from overall score
enforcement spike5,084Sudden increase in EPA/state enforcement actions
rapid decline3,512Safety score deteriorating faster than regional trend
wealth paradox1,579High-income ZIP with unexpectedly poor safety scores
pfas cluster1,022Adjacent ZIP codes with concurrent PFAS exceedances
silent danger616Elevated contaminants with zero enforcement actions
island of safety369Safe ZIP surrounded by high-risk neighbors
school zone risk125Schools in ZIP codes with elevated lead, water, or air quality concerns
infrastructure mismatch12New housing atop old infrastructure
double burden11Low income + high environmental risk

Notable Anomalies

pfas cluster

ZIP 10507 (severity 8/10): PFAS cluster: 3 adjacent ZIPs near Bedford Hills, NY all exceed limits

ZIP 10562 (severity 8/10): PFAS cluster: 3 adjacent ZIPs near Ossining, NY all exceed limits

ZIP 10588 (severity 8/10): PFAS cluster: 3 adjacent ZIPs near Shrub Oak, NY all exceed limits

silent danger

ZIP 01441 (severity 10/10): Westminster, MA (01441) has 3 violations, 3 health-based violations but zero enforcement actions

ZIP 01473 (severity 10/10): Westminster, MA (01473) has 3 violations, 3 health-based violations but zero enforcement actions

ZIP 03101 (severity 10/10): Manchester, NH (03101) has 9 violations, 3 health-based violations but zero enforcement actions

rapid decline

ZIP 01098 (severity 10/10): Worthington, MA (01098) safety score plunged 25 points (83→58)

ZIP 01225 (severity 10/10): Cheshire, MA (01225) safety score plunged 25 points (78→53)

ZIP 02153 (severity 10/10): Medford, MA (02153) safety score plunged 30 points (43→13)

enforcement spike

ZIP 01568 (severity 10/10): Upton, MA (01568) hit with 5 enforcement actions in the past year

ZIP 01921 (severity 10/10): Boxford, MA (01921) hit with 8 enforcement actions in the past year

ZIP 02330 (severity 10/10): Carver, MA (02330) hit with 6 enforcement actions in the past year

wealth paradox

ZIP 01072 (severity 7/10): Shutesbury, MA (01072): $103K median income but D safety grade

ZIP 01270 (severity 7/10): Windsor, MA (01270): $105K median income but D safety grade

ZIP 01346 (severity 7/10): Heath, MA (01346): $111K median income but D safety grade

7. Methodology & Data Sources

This report is generated from ZipCheckup's production data pipeline, which aggregates and normalizes data from 63 federal and state sources. At the time of generation, 23 sources were classified as fresh (updated within their expected frequency).

Scoring Model

Weighted composite of 17 risk verticals. Each ZIP receives 0-100 score. Grades: A (80-100), B (65-79), C (50-64), D (35-49), F (0-34).

17 Risk Verticals

• Water Quality
• Lead Exposure
• PFAS Contamination
• Radon
• Flood Risk
• Wildfire & Smoke
• Earthquake
• Mold
• CO & Gas Safety
• Infrastructure Decay
• Air Quality
• Superfund Proximity
• School Environmental Health
• Nuclear Proximity
• Bridge Safety
• Energy Costs
• Respiratory Risk

Data Frequency

Daily (violations, alerts, AQI), weekly (ECHO, CCR), monthly (EPA, Census, BLS)

Open Data

All underlying data is available under CC BY 4.0:

8. Download & Embed

Download the full dataset

Structured JSON with all state rankings, anomalies, and methodology. Free under CC BY 4.0.

Download JSON (65 KB)

Embed This Report

Journalists and publishers can embed a link badge to this report:

<a href="https://zipcheckup.com/reports/state-of-home-safety-2026/">State of Home Safety 2026 — ZipCheckup</a>

Citation

ZipCheckup. "State of Home Safety 2026." Published April 3, 2026. https://zipcheckup.com/reports/state-of-home-safety-2026/. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.

Media Contact

For data requests, interviews, or high-resolution graphics: [email protected]

Report generated from ZipCheckup production data on April 3, 2026. Data vintage: 2026-04-03. Methodology details at zipcheckup.com/about.

Cite this report

Open data, CC BY 4.0. Attribution required.

APA
Akulov, A. (2026). State of Home Safety 2026. ZipCheckup. https://zipcheckup.com/reports/state-of-home-safety-2026/
Chicago
Akulov, A. "State of Home Safety 2026." ZipCheckup, 2026. https://zipcheckup.com/reports/state-of-home-safety-2026/.
Inline
ZipCheckup, 2026 (https://zipcheckup.com/reports/state-of-home-safety-2026/)
BibTeX
@techreport{zipcheckup2026_state_of_home_safety_202,
  author = {Akulov, A.},
  title = {State of Home Safety 2026},
  institution = {ZipCheckup},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://zipcheckup.com/reports/state-of-home-safety-2026/}
}
License CC BY 4.0
Press contact [email protected]

Embed this report

Free for newsroom and academic use. Attribution required.

HTML embed Linked thumbnail with caption. Paste anywhere HTML is allowed.
<a href="https://zipcheckup.com/reports/state-of-home-safety-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
  <img src="https://zipcheckup.com/og/reports/state-of-home-safety-2026.png"
       width="1200" height="630" alt="State of Home Safety 2026 — ZipCheckup 2026">
</a>
Social card (1200×630) Drop into an article header or social share. Updates with the live report.
PNG ↓
State of Home Safety 2026 — ZipCheckup 2026