2026 Rankings

Worst Infrastructure: Nebraska — 2026 Rankings

Last updated: June 4, 2026

613 ZIP codes ranked by Pipe Failure Risk #1: ZIP 69036 (Lebanon, NE) — 66%

Out of 613 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in Nebraska, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 613
Highest risk 66%
Median risk 43%
Average risk 41%
State Nebraska

Top 100 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 69036 Lebanon NE 66% Very High
2 68324 Burr NE 64% Very High 33/100
3 68440 Steele City NE 64% Very High 24/100
4 68791 Wisner NE 63% Very High 13/100
5 69337 Chadron NE 63% Very High 50/100
6 68710 Allen NE 61% Very High 22/100
7 68769 Plainview NE 60% High 33/100
8 69331 Angora NE 60% High 53/100
9 68770 Ponca NE 58% High 45/100
10 68901 Hastings NE 58% High 62/100
11 68367 Gresham NE 56% High 64/100
12 68623 Belgrade NE 56% High 59/100
13 68654 Polk NE 56% High 66/100
14 69219 Nenzel NE 56% High 66/100
15 69351 Lakeside NE 56% High 63/100
16 68072 Winslow NE 54% High 45/100
17 68107 Omaha NE 54% High 46/100
18 68108 Omaha NE 54% High 51/100
19 68865 Phillips NE 54% High 38/100
20 68946 Hendley NE 54% High 40/100
21 68004 Bancroft NE 53% High 40/100
22 68055 Rosalie NE 53% High 66/100
23 68666 Stromsburg NE 53% High 60/100
24 69354 Marsland NE 53% High 53/100
25 69355 Melbeta NE 53% High 53/100
26 68105 Omaha NE 52% High 51/100
27 68111 Omaha NE 52% High 51/100
28 68132 Omaha NE 52% High 46/100
29 68601 Columbus NE 52% High 35/100
30 68667 Surprise NE 52% High 40/100
31 68747 Mclean NE 52% High 64/100
32 68882 Wolbach NE 52% High 62/100
33 68926 Beaver City NE 52% High 35/100
34 68942 Guide Rock NE 52% High 70/100
35 69039 Moorefield NE 52% High 65/100
36 68104 Omaha NE 51% High 46/100
37 68112 Omaha NE 51% High 46/100
38 68326 Carleton NE 51% High 47/100
39 68329 Cook NE 51% High 56/100
40 68364 Goehner NE 51% High 61/100
41 68631 Creston NE 51% High 61/100
42 68638 Fullerton NE 51% High 67/100
43 68739 Hartington NE 51% High 58/100
44 68745 Laurel NE 51% High 60/100
45 68749 Magnet NE 51% High 65/100
46 68789 Winnetoon NE 51% High 61/100
47 68813 Anselmo NE 51% High 82/100
48 68816 Archer NE 51% High 63/100
49 68935 Edgar NE 51% High 33/100
50 68940 Funk NE 51% High 65/100
51 69128 Bushnell NE 51% High 75/100
52 68110 Omaha NE 50% High 51/100
53 68323 Burchard NE 50% High 58/100
54 68332 Crab Orchard NE 50% High 54/100
55 68452 Ong NE 50% High 65/100
56 68655 Primrose NE 50% High 66/100
57 68751 Maskell NE 50% High 64/100
58 69161 Seneca NE 50% High 66/100
59 69353 Mcgrew NE 50% High 53/100
60 68001 Abie NE 49% High 66/100
61 68040 Malmo NE 49% High 66/100
62 68106 Omaha NE 49% High 46/100
63 68117 Omaha NE 49% High 46/100
64 68309 Barneston NE 49% High 66/100
65 68325 Byron NE 49% High 64/100
66 68375 Hubbell NE 49% High 69/100
67 68380 Lewiston NE 49% High 66/100
68 68416 Ohiowa NE 49% High 62/100
69 68417 Otoe NE 49% High 70/100
70 68421 Peru NE 49% High 63/100
71 68438 Sprague NE 49% High 64/100
72 68439 Staplehurst NE 49% High 65/100
73 68444 Strang NE 49% High 40/100
74 68445 Swanton NE 49% High 68/100
75 68457 Verdon NE 49% High 66/100
76 68664 Snyder NE 49% High 52/100
77 68717 Belden NE 49% High 66/100
78 68724 Center NE 49% High 66/100
79 68758 Newman Grove NE 49% High 70/100
80 68764 Orchard NE 49% High 73/100
81 68766 Page NE 49% High 99/100
82 68783 Verdigre NE 49% High 66/100
83 68786 Wausa NE 49% High 66/100
84 68846 Hordville NE 49% High 66/100
85 68929 Bloomington NE 49% High 66/100
86 68936 Edison NE 49% High 66/100
87 68948 Holbrook NE 49% High 64/100
88 68966 Orleans NE 49% High 66/100
89 68972 Riverton NE 49% High 70/100
90 68975 Saronville NE 49% High 40/100
91 69041 Parks NE 49% High 53/100
92 69122 Big Springs NE 49% High 83/100
93 69142 Halsey NE 49% High 66/100
94 69334 Bayard NE 49% High 83/100
95 68019 Craig NE 48% High 59/100
96 68057 Scribner NE 48% High 65/100
97 68131 Omaha NE 48% High 46/100
98 68345 Du Bois NE 48% High 40/100
99 68359 Friend NE 48% High 59/100
100 68376 Humboldt NE 48% High 70/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-06-04.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

How this ranking is calculated, data sources, and limitations: Rankings Methodology →


Related Rankings

Water Safety 2026 EPA violations and water quality scores Lead Risk 2026 Lead pipe infrastructure and EPA exceedances Infrastructure 2026 Aging pipes, system age and remediation costs
Disclaimer: Rankings are based on EPA, FEMA, and federal agency data. They reflect historical patterns and risk indicators, not necessarily current conditions. For the most current information, contact your local water utility or request a Consumer Confidence Report.

Get safety alerts for Nebraska

Free updates when EPA data changes for this area. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy.

Share This Page

X Facebook
Check your water filter options Free tool — no phone call required.