2026 Rankings

Worst Infrastructure: Houston Metro — 2026

Last updated: June 4, 2026

206 ZIP codes ranked by Pipe Failure Risk #1: ZIP 77011 (Houston, TX) — 46%

Out of 206 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in the Houston metro area, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 206
Highest risk 46%
Median risk 24%
Average risk 28%

Top 100 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 77011 Houston TX 46% High 84/100
2 77009 Houston TX 43% High 79/100
3 77012 Houston TX 43% High 84/100
4 77023 Houston TX 43% High 79/100
5 77506 Pasadena TX 43% High 71/100
6 77520 Baytown TX 43% High 74/100
7 77020 Houston TX 42% High 84/100
8 77026 Houston TX 42% High 74/100
9 77029 Houston TX 42% High 79/100
10 77033 Houston TX 41% High 79/100
11 77061 Houston TX 41% High 79/100
12 77016 Houston TX 40% Moderate 74/100
13 77087 Houston TX 40% Moderate 74/100
14 77502 Pasadena TX 40% Moderate 66/100
15 77017 Houston TX 39% Moderate 79/100
16 77022 Houston TX 39% Moderate 74/100
17 77028 Houston TX 39% Moderate 74/100
18 77093 Houston TX 39% Moderate 74/100
19 77503 Pasadena TX 39% Moderate 66/100
20 77035 Houston TX 38% Moderate 74/100
21 77039 Houston TX 38% Moderate 74/100
22 77074 Houston TX 38% Moderate 74/100
23 77076 Houston TX 38% Moderate 74/100
24 77018 Houston TX 37% Moderate 74/100
25 77031 Houston TX 37% Moderate 79/100
26 77037 Houston TX 37% Moderate 74/100
27 77080 Houston TX 37% Moderate 74/100
28 77096 Houston TX 37% Moderate 74/100
29 77013 Houston TX 36% Moderate 74/100
30 77021 Houston TX 36% Moderate 79/100
31 77034 Houston TX 36% Moderate 74/100
32 77036 Houston TX 36% Moderate 79/100
33 77050 Houston TX 36% Moderate 79/100
34 77072 Houston TX 36% Moderate 74/100
35 77081 Houston TX 36% Moderate 79/100
36 77088 Houston TX 36% Moderate 74/100
37 77092 Houston TX 36% Moderate 79/100
38 77587 South Houston TX 36% Moderate 75/100
39 77078 Houston TX 35% Moderate 79/100
40 77004 Houston TX 34% Moderate 79/100
41 77015 Houston TX 34% Moderate 74/100
42 77043 Houston TX 34% Moderate 79/100
43 77060 Houston TX 34% Moderate 74/100
44 77062 Houston TX 34% Moderate 74/100
45 77071 Houston TX 34% Moderate 79/100
46 77504 Pasadena TX 34% Moderate 71/100
47 77045 Houston TX 33% Moderate 74/100
48 77055 Houston TX 33% Moderate 79/100
49 77057 Houston TX 33% Moderate 79/100
50 77063 Houston TX 33% Moderate 79/100
51 77091 Houston TX 33% Moderate 79/100
52 77099 Houston TX 33% Moderate 74/100
53 77042 Houston TX 32% Moderate 74/100
54 77051 Houston TX 32% Moderate 79/100
55 77053 Houston TX 32% Moderate 79/100
56 77058 Houston TX 32% Moderate 74/100
57 77079 Houston TX 32% Moderate 74/100
58 77086 Houston TX 32% Moderate 79/100
59 77024 Houston TX 31% Moderate 74/100
60 77032 Houston TX 31% Moderate 74/100
61 77048 Houston TX 31% Moderate 79/100
62 77066 Houston TX 31% Moderate 74/100
63 77067 Houston TX 31% Moderate 79/100
64 77068 Houston TX 31% Moderate 79/100
65 77089 Houston TX 31% Moderate 74/100
66 77003 Houston TX 30% Moderate 84/100
67 77006 Houston TX 30% Moderate 79/100
68 77008 Houston TX 30% Moderate 74/100
69 77040 Houston TX 30% Moderate 74/100
70 77098 Houston TX 29% Moderate 79/100
71 77521 Baytown TX 29% Moderate 74/100
72 77005 Houston TX 28% Moderate 79/100
73 77025 Houston TX 28% Moderate 74/100
74 77069 Houston TX 28% Moderate 79/100
75 77090 Houston TX 28% Moderate 74/100
76 77002 Houston TX 27% Moderate 79/100
77 77030 Houston TX 27% Moderate 79/100
78 77038 Houston TX 27% Moderate 74/100
79 77077 Houston TX 27% Moderate 74/100
80 77505 Pasadena TX 27% Moderate 66/100
81 77522 Baytown TX 27% Moderate 84/100
82 77019 Houston TX 26% Moderate 79/100
83 77054 Houston TX 26% Moderate 84/100
84 77075 Houston TX 26% Moderate 74/100
85 77083 Houston TX 26% Moderate 79/100
86 77085 Houston TX 26% Moderate 84/100
87 77056 Houston TX 25% Moderate 79/100
88 77065 Houston TX 25% Moderate 79/100
89 77070 Houston TX 25% Moderate 74/100
90 77478 Sugar Land TX 25% Moderate 78/100
91 77501 Pasadena TX 25% Moderate 81/100
92 77508 Pasadena TX 25% Moderate 86/100
93 77001 Houston TX 24% Moderate 89/100
94 77041 Houston TX 24% Moderate 79/100
95 77046 Houston TX 24% Moderate 89/100
96 77049 Houston TX 24% Moderate 74/100
97 77052 Houston TX 24% Moderate 84/100
98 77059 Houston TX 24% Moderate 79/100
99 77082 Houston TX 24% Moderate 74/100
100 77084 Houston TX 24% Moderate 74/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-06-04.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

How this ranking is calculated, data sources, and limitations: Rankings Methodology →


Related Rankings

Water Safety 2026 EPA violations and water quality scores Lead Risk 2026 Lead pipe infrastructure and EPA exceedances Infrastructure 2026 Aging pipes, system age and remediation costs
Disclaimer: Rankings are based on EPA, FEMA, and federal agency data. They reflect historical patterns and risk indicators, not necessarily current conditions. For the most current information, contact your local water utility or request a Consumer Confidence Report.

Get safety alerts

Free updates when EPA data changes for this area. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy.

Share This Page

X Facebook
Check your water filter options Free tool — no phone call required.