2026 Rankings

Worst Infrastructure: Charlotte Metro — 2026

Last updated: June 4, 2026

87 ZIP codes ranked by Pipe Failure Risk #1: ZIP 28223 (Charlotte, NC) — 49%

Out of 87 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in the Charlotte metro area, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 87
Highest risk 49%
Median risk 35%
Average risk 34%

Top 87 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 28223 Charlotte NC 49% High 84/100
2 28207 Charlotte NC 46% High 68/100
3 28052 Gastonia NC 43% High 77/100
4 28205 Charlotte NC 43% High 68/100
5 28208 Charlotte NC 43% High 73/100
6 28025 Concord NC 41% High 81/100
7 28212 Charlotte NC 40% Moderate 78/100
8 28210 Charlotte NC 39% Moderate 73/100
9 28211 Charlotte NC 39% Moderate 68/100
10 28209 Charlotte NC 38% Moderate 68/100
11 28226 Charlotte NC 38% Moderate 73/100
12 28026 Concord NC 37% Moderate 87/100
13 28054 Gastonia NC 37% Moderate 77/100
14 28053 Gastonia NC 36% Moderate 82/100
15 28055 Gastonia NC 36% Moderate 82/100
16 28201 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
17 28206 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 73/100
18 28218 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
19 28219 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
20 28220 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
21 28221 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
22 28222 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
23 28224 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
24 28228 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
25 28229 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
26 28230 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
27 28231 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
28 28232 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
29 28233 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
30 28234 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
31 28235 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
32 28236 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
33 28237 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
34 28241 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
35 28242 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
36 28243 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
37 28244 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
38 28246 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
39 28247 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
40 28250 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
41 28253 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
42 28254 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
43 28255 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
44 28256 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
45 28258 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
46 28260 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
47 28263 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
48 28265 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
49 28266 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
50 28271 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
51 28272 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
52 28274 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
53 28275 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
54 28280 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
55 28281 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
56 28282 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
57 28284 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
58 28285 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
59 28287 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
60 28288 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
61 28289 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
62 28290 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
63 28296 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
64 28297 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 84/100
65 28299 Charlotte NC 35% Moderate 83/100
66 28217 Charlotte NC 34% Moderate 78/100
67 28227 Charlotte NC 34% Moderate 78/100
68 28215 Charlotte NC 33% Moderate 68/100
69 28056 Gastonia NC 32% Moderate 82/100
70 28214 Charlotte NC 32% Moderate 68/100
71 28216 Charlotte NC 32% Moderate 73/100
72 28270 Charlotte NC 32% Moderate 78/100
73 28203 Charlotte NC 31% Moderate 78/100
74 28204 Charlotte NC 31% Moderate 78/100
75 28213 Charlotte NC 31% Moderate 78/100
76 28027 Concord NC 30% Moderate 81/100
77 29731 Rock Hill SC 30% Moderate 82/100
78 29733 Rock Hill SC 30% Moderate 82/100
79 29734 Rock Hill SC 30% Moderate 82/100
80 29730 Rock Hill SC 28% Moderate 77/100
81 28202 Charlotte NC 26% Moderate 83/100
82 28269 Charlotte NC 26% Moderate 83/100
83 28262 Charlotte NC 25% Moderate 83/100
84 28273 Charlotte NC 25% Moderate 83/100
85 28277 Charlotte NC 25% Moderate 78/100
86 29732 Rock Hill SC 25% Moderate 77/100
87 28278 Charlotte NC 24% Moderate 83/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-06-04.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

How this ranking is calculated, data sources, and limitations: Rankings Methodology →


Related Rankings

Water Safety 2026 EPA violations and water quality scores Lead Risk 2026 Lead pipe infrastructure and EPA exceedances Infrastructure 2026 Aging pipes, system age and remediation costs
Disclaimer: Rankings are based on EPA, FEMA, and federal agency data. They reflect historical patterns and risk indicators, not necessarily current conditions. For the most current information, contact your local water utility or request a Consumer Confidence Report.

Get safety alerts

Free updates when EPA data changes for this area. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy.

Share This Page

X Facebook
Check your water filter options Free tool — no phone call required.