2026 Rankings

Worst Infrastructure: South Carolina — 2026 Rankings

Last updated: October 15, 2026

412 ZIP codes ranked by Infrastructure Stress Indicator #1: ZIP 29338 (Fingerville, SC) - 69/100

Out of 412 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in South Carolina, these areas have the highest modeled infrastructure stress indicator values, computed from area-level data on infrastructure age, funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. The indicator is not a measured failure probability or forecast.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 412
Highest stress indicator 69/100
Median stress indicator 30/100
Average stress indicator 31/100
State South Carolina

Top 100 ZIP Codes by Infrastructure Stress

Rank ZIP Code City State Infrastructure Stress Stress Level Safety Score
1 29338 Fingerville SC 69/100 Very High —
2 29424 Charleston SC 68/100 Very High 83/100
3 29364 Lockhart SC 64/100 Very High —
4 29409 Charleston SC 64/100 Very High 83/100
5 29844 Parksville SC 60/100 High —
6 29683 Slater SC 59/100 High —
7 29665 Newry SC 57/100 High —
8 29401 Charleston SC 56/100 High 83/100
9 29594 Tatum SC 56/100 High —
10 29840 Mount Carmel SC 55/100 High —
11 29351 Joanna SC 53/100 High —
12 29834 Langley SC 53/100 High 100/100
13 29493 Williams SC 52/100 High —
14 29826 Elko SC 52/100 High —
15 29205 Columbia SC 51/100 High 82/100
16 29373 Pacolet Mills SC 49/100 High —
17 29122 Peak SC 48/100 High —
18 29346 Glendale SC 48/100 High 83/100
19 29377 Startex SC 47/100 High —
20 29403 Charleston SC 47/100 High 83/100
21 29405 North Charleston SC 47/100 High 83/100
22 29204 Columbia SC 46/100 High 82/100
23 29543 Fork SC 46/100 High —
24 29845 Plum Branch SC 46/100 High —
25 29180 Winnsboro SC 45/100 High —
26 29206 Columbia SC 45/100 High 81/100
27 29379 Union SC 45/100 High —
28 29614 Greenville SC 45/100 High 65/100
29 29667 Norris SC 45/100 High —
30 29832 Johnston SC 45/100 High —
31 29320 Arcadia SC 44/100 High 83/100
32 29325 Clinton SC 44/100 High —
33 29407 Charleston SC 44/100 High 83/100
34 29520 Cheraw SC 44/100 High 78/100
35 29044 Eastover SC 43/100 High —
36 29081 Ehrhardt SC 43/100 High —
37 29105 Monetta SC 43/100 High —
38 29166 Ward SC 43/100 High —
39 29203 Columbia SC 43/100 High 81/100
40 29210 Columbia SC 43/100 High —
41 29375 Reidville SC 43/100 High —
42 29082 Lodge SC 42/100 High —
43 29209 Columbia SC 42/100 High 76/100
44 29519 Centenary SC 42/100 High —
45 29659 Lowndesville SC 42/100 High —
46 29801 Aiken SC 42/100 High 83/100
47 29051 Gable SC 41/100 High —
48 29175 Westville SC 41/100 High —
49 29620 Abbeville SC 41/100 High —
50 29628 Calhoun Falls SC 41/100 High —
51 29836 Martin SC 41/100 High —
52 29921 Furman SC 41/100 High —
53 29943 Tillman SC 41/100 High —
54 29014 Blackstock SC 40/100 Moderate —
55 29042 Denmark SC 40/100 Moderate —
56 29061 Hopkins SC 40/100 Moderate 72/100
57 29074 Liberty Hill SC 40/100 Moderate —
58 29446 Green Pond SC 40/100 Moderate —
59 29001 Alcolu SC 39/100 Moderate —
60 29003 Bamberg SC 39/100 Moderate —
61 29015 Blair SC 39/100 Moderate —
62 29111 New Zion SC 39/100 Moderate —
63 29130 Ridgeway SC 39/100 Moderate —
64 29138 Saluda SC 39/100 Moderate —
65 29146 Springfield SC 39/100 Moderate —
66 29169 West Columbia SC 39/100 Moderate —
67 29355 Kinards SC 39/100 Moderate —
68 29518 Cades SC 39/100 Moderate —
69 29564 Lane SC 39/100 Moderate —
70 29580 Nesmith SC 39/100 Moderate —
71 29624 Anderson SC 39/100 Moderate 64/100
72 29646 Greenwood SC 39/100 Moderate —
73 29671 Pickens SC 39/100 Moderate —
74 29848 Troy SC 39/100 Moderate —
75 29911 Brunson SC 39/100 Moderate —
76 29922 Garnett SC 39/100 Moderate —
77 29031 Carlisle SC 38/100 Moderate —
78 29114 Olanta SC 38/100 Moderate —
79 29333 Drayton SC 38/100 Moderate 83/100
80 29368 Mayo SC 38/100 Moderate 83/100
81 29448 Harleyville SC 38/100 Moderate —
82 29556 Kingstree SC 38/100 Moderate —
83 29655 Iva SC 38/100 Moderate 58/100
84 29709 Chesterfield SC 38/100 Moderate 100/100
85 29851 Warrenville SC 38/100 Moderate 83/100
86 29009 Bethune SC 37/100 Moderate —
87 29010 Bishopville SC 37/100 Moderate —
88 29020 Camden SC 37/100 Moderate —
89 29067 Kershaw SC 37/100 Moderate —
90 29133 Rowesville SC 37/100 Moderate —
91 29178 Whitmire SC 37/100 Moderate —
92 29201 Columbia SC 37/100 Moderate 82/100
93 29329 Converse SC 37/100 Moderate 83/100
94 29360 Laurens SC 37/100 Moderate —
95 29482 Sullivans Island SC 37/100 Moderate 83/100
96 29584 Patrick SC 37/100 Moderate 95/100
97 29621 Anderson SC 37/100 Moderate 79/100
98 29687 Taylors SC 37/100 Moderate 65/100
99 29741 Ruby SC 37/100 Moderate 100/100
100 29828 Gloverville SC 37/100 Moderate 100/100

Methodology

Infrastructure stress rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment (DWINSA 2023) — state-level 20-year infrastructure need per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) available Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and testing results. The combined value is a normalized 0-100 comparative stress indicator, not a measured pipe-failure probability or a forecast.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-10-15.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the infrastructure stress indicator mean?

The indicator summarizes infrastructure funding gaps, housing age, violation history, and lead indicators on a 0-100 scale. It is a comparative heuristic, not a measured pipe-failure probability or a forecast of a water-main break.

How is infrastructure stress calculated?

The indicator combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure need per capita (EPA DWINSA 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system compliance history (EPA SDWIS), and available lead indicators.

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Ask your water utility or health department about testing your tap water, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. If you use a filter, choose one certified under NSF/ANSI 53 for the specific contaminant, such as lead. Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high stress mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure stress is a screening indicator of long-term vulnerability, not a measurement of current contamination or a prediction of failure. For current conditions, check utility notices and the latest Consumer Confidence Report, and test your tap for contaminants of concern.

Explore More Rankings

How this ranking is calculated, data sources, and limitations: Rankings Methodology →


Related Rankings

Water Safety 2026 EPA violations and water quality scores Lead Risk 2026 Lead service-line indicators and system-level action-level exceedances Infrastructure 2026 Aging pipes, system age and remediation costs
Disclaimer: Rankings are based on EPA, FEMA, and federal agency data. They reflect historical patterns and risk indicators, not necessarily current conditions. For the most current information, contact your local water utility or request a Consumer Confidence Report.

Get safety alerts for South Carolina

Free updates when EPA data changes for this area. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy.

Share This Page

X Facebook
Check your water filter options Free tool - no phone call required.