2026 Rankings

Worst Infrastructure: South Carolina — 2026 Rankings

Last updated: June 4, 2026

482 ZIP codes ranked by Pipe Failure Risk #1: ZIP 29364 (Lockhart, SC) — 60%

Out of 482 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in South Carolina, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 482
Highest risk 60%
Median risk 30%
Average risk 31%
State South Carolina

Top 100 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 29364 Lockhart SC 60% High 87/100
2 29062 Horatio SC 59% High 73/100
3 29338 Fingerville SC 59% High 53/100
4 29373 Pacolet Mills SC 59% High 53/100
5 29724 Lando SC 59% High 53/100
6 29346 Glendale SC 58% High 53/100
7 29320 Arcadia SC 54% High 53/100
8 29205 Columbia SC 53% High 75/100
9 29424 Charleston SC 53% High 99/100
10 29665 Newry SC 51% High 53/100
11 29409 Charleston SC 50% High 99/100
12 29844 Parksville SC 50% High 66/100
13 29683 Slater SC 49% High 40/100
14 29204 Columbia SC 48% High 80/100
15 29333 Drayton SC 48% High 53/100
16 29329 Converse SC 47% High 53/100
17 29377 Startex SC 47% High 53/100
18 29079 Lydia SC 46% High 66/100
19 29206 Columbia SC 46% High 75/100
20 29331 Cross Anchor SC 46% High 53/100
21 29594 Tatum SC 46% High 66/100
22 29122 Peak SC 45% High 66/100
23 29210 Columbia SC 45% High 75/100
24 29401 Charleston SC 45% High 75/100
25 29520 Cheraw SC 45% High 67/100
26 29840 Mount Carmel SC 45% High 63/100
27 29113 Norway SC 44% High 69/100
28 29203 Columbia SC 44% High 80/100
29 29355 Kinards SC 44% High 53/100
30 29379 Union SC 44% High 94/100
31 29543 Fork SC 44% High 73/100
32 29624 Anderson SC 44% High 82/100
33 29834 Langley SC 44% High 98/100
34 29324 Clifton SC 43% High 53/100
35 29351 Joanna SC 43% High 53/100
36 29042 Denmark SC 42% High 91/100
37 29166 Ward SC 42% High 66/100
38 29493 Williams SC 42% High 91/100
39 29639 Due West SC 42% High 63/100
40 29801 Aiken SC 42% High 70/100
41 29031 Carlisle SC 41% High 67/100
42 29340 Gaffney SC 41% High 74/100
43 29353 Jonesville SC 41% High 94/100
44 29628 Calhoun Falls SC 41% High 72/100
45 29055 Great Falls SC 40% Moderate 78/100
46 29201 Columbia SC 40% Moderate 85/100
47 29368 Mayo SC 40% Moderate 53/100
48 29614 Greenville SC 40% Moderate 55/100
49 29802 Aiken SC 40% Moderate 66/100
50 29804 Aiken SC 40% Moderate 66/100
51 29808 Aiken SC 40% Moderate 66/100
52 29845 Plum Branch SC 40% Moderate 66/100
53 29209 Columbia SC 39% Moderate 80/100
54 29375 Reidville SC 39% Moderate 53/100
55 29519 Centenary SC 39% Moderate 66/100
56 29051 Gable SC 38% Moderate 66/100
57 29133 Rowesville SC 38% Moderate 73/100
58 29180 Winnsboro SC 38% Moderate 69/100
59 29212 Columbia SC 38% Moderate 80/100
60 29302 Spartanburg SC 38% Moderate 77/100
61 29516 Blenheim SC 38% Moderate 73/100
62 29556 Kingstree SC 38% Moderate 83/100
63 29570 Mc Coll SC 38% Moderate 73/100
64 29659 Lowndesville SC 38% Moderate 53/100
65 29138 Saluda SC 37% Moderate 87/100
66 29175 Westville SC 37% Moderate 66/100
67 29335 Enoree SC 37% Moderate 53/100
68 29342 Gaffney SC 37% Moderate 72/100
69 29403 Charleston SC 37% Moderate 80/100
70 29448 Harleyville SC 37% Moderate 91/100
71 29477 Saint George SC 37% Moderate 73/100
72 29528 Conway SC 37% Moderate 91/100
73 29593 Society Hill SC 37% Moderate 66/100
74 29646 Greenwood SC 37% Moderate 95/100
75 29836 Martin SC 37% Moderate 66/100
76 29848 Troy SC 37% Moderate 53/100
77 29925 Hilton Head Island SC 37% Moderate 90/100
78 29928 Hilton Head Island SC 37% Moderate 75/100
79 29938 Hilton Head Island SC 37% Moderate 90/100
80 29943 Tillman SC 37% Moderate 66/100
81 29002 Ballentine SC 36% Moderate 68/100
82 29014 Blackstock SC 36% Moderate 66/100
83 29039 Cordova SC 36% Moderate 73/100
84 29074 Liberty Hill SC 36% Moderate 65/100
85 29104 Mayesville SC 36% Moderate 66/100
86 29135 Saint Matthews SC 36% Moderate 73/100
87 29178 Whitmire SC 36% Moderate 95/100
88 29202 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 90/100
89 29208 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 93/100
90 29211 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 93/100
91 29214 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 90/100
92 29215 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 90/100
93 29216 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 93/100
94 29217 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 93/100
95 29218 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 93/100
96 29219 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 93/100
97 29220 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 93/100
98 29221 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 90/100
99 29222 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 90/100
100 29223 Columbia SC 36% Moderate 80/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-06-04.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

How this ranking is calculated, data sources, and limitations: Rankings Methodology →


Related Rankings

Water Safety 2026 EPA violations and water quality scores Lead Risk 2026 Lead pipe infrastructure and EPA exceedances Infrastructure 2026 Aging pipes, system age and remediation costs
Disclaimer: Rankings are based on EPA, FEMA, and federal agency data. They reflect historical patterns and risk indicators, not necessarily current conditions. For the most current information, contact your local water utility or request a Consumer Confidence Report.

Get safety alerts for South Carolina

Free updates when EPA data changes for this area. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy.

Share This Page

X Facebook
Check your water filter options Free tool — no phone call required.