2026 Rankings

Worst Infrastructure: California — 2026 Rankings

Last updated: July 19, 2026

2,432 ZIP codes ranked by Pipe Failure Risk #1: ZIP 94021 (Loma Mar, CA) - 70%

Out of 2,432 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in California, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 2,432
Highest risk 70%
Median risk 38%
Average risk 37%
State California

Top 100 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 94021 Loma Mar CA 70% Very High 83/100
2 94512 Birds Landing CA 68% Very High 73/100
3 95325 Hornitos CA 68% Very High 53/100
4 95419 Camp Meeker CA 66% Very High 98/100
5 94569 Port Costa CA 65% Very High 73/100
6 93943 Monterey CA 63% Very High 73/100
7 94707 Berkeley CA 63% Very High 63/100
8 95720 Kyburz CA 63% Very High 50/100
9 95950 Grimes CA 63% Very High 58/100
10 96009 Bieber CA 62% Very High 97/100
11 91104 Pasadena CA 61% Very High 81/100
12 91125 Pasadena CA 61% Very High 81/100
13 94940 Marshall CA 61% Very High 73/100
14 92332 Essex CA 60% High 53/100
15 93741 Fresno CA 60% High 73/100
16 94950 Olema CA 60% High 73/100
17 94577 San Leandro CA 59% High 58/100
18 94937 Inverness CA 59% High 88/100
19 95550 Korbel CA 59% High 66/100
20 95601 Amador City CA 59% High 63/100
21 95735 Twin Bridges CA 59% High 53/100
22 95957 Meridian CA 59% High 65/100
23 91107 Pasadena CA 58% High 76/100
24 91316 Encino CA 58% High 23/100
25 93106 Santa Barbara CA 58% High 64/100
26 93541 Lee Vining CA 58% High 71/100
27 93563 Valyermo CA 58% High 78/100
28 94525 Crockett CA 58% High 66/100
29 94702 Berkeley CA 58% High 63/100
30 94708 Berkeley CA 58% High 55/100
31 95018 Felton CA 58% High 55/100
32 95380 Turlock CA 58% High 65/100
33 95486 Villa Grande CA 58% High 65/100
34 95494 Yorkville CA 58% High 66/100
35 94116 San Francisco CA 57% High 54/100
36 94578 San Leandro CA 57% High 58/100
37 94705 Berkeley CA 57% High 63/100
38 94709 Berkeley CA 57% High 63/100
39 95319 Empire CA 57% High 53/100
40 95564 Samoa CA 57% High 66/100
41 90073 Los Angeles CA 56% High 78/100
42 90806 Long Beach CA 56% High 70/100
43 91103 Pasadena CA 56% High 76/100
44 91201 Glendale CA 56% High 83/100
45 91436 Encino CA 56% High 18/100
46 94108 San Francisco CA 56% High 59/100
47 94117 San Francisco CA 56% High 53/100
48 94122 San Francisco CA 56% High 59/100
49 94127 San Francisco CA 56% High 59/100
50 94576 Deer Park CA 56% High 66/100
51 94579 San Leandro CA 56% High 53/100
52 94703 Berkeley CA 56% High 63/100
53 94964 San Quentin CA 56% High 66/100
54 95606 Brooks CA 56% High 73/100
55 95613 Coloma CA 56% High 55/100
56 96115 Lake City CA 56% High 66/100
57 90270 Maywood CA 55% High 72/100
58 92102 San Diego CA 55% High 60/100
59 93247 Lindsay CA 55% High 28/100
60 94010 Burlingame CA 55% High 67/100
61 94112 San Francisco CA 55% High 54/100
62 94114 San Francisco CA 55% High 59/100
63 94118 San Francisco CA 55% High 59/100
64 94123 San Francisco CA 55% High 59/100
65 95202 Stockton CA 55% High 77/100
66 95471 Rio Nido CA 55% High 60/100
67 95690 Walnut Grove CA 55% High 75/100
68 95721 Echo Lake CA 55% High 53/100
69 95910 Alleghany CA 55% High 83/100
70 90704 Avalon CA 54% High 83/100
71 90742 Sunset Beach CA 54% High 65/100
72 91207 Glendale CA 54% High 83/100
73 92106 San Diego CA 54% High 60/100
74 92107 San Diego CA 54% High 60/100
75 92116 San Diego CA 54% High 60/100
76 92312 Barstow CA 54% High 39/100
77 92356 Lucerne Valley CA 54% High 69/100
78 93539 Lancaster CA 54% High 36/100
79 93584 Lancaster CA 54% High 36/100
80 93586 Lancaster CA 54% High 36/100
81 93613 Clovis CA 54% High 73/100
82 93923 Carmel CA 54% High 68/100
83 94104 San Francisco CA 54% High 59/100
84 94110 San Francisco CA 54% High 59/100
85 94121 San Francisco CA 54% High 59/100
86 94129 San Francisco CA 54% High 53/100
87 94501 Alameda CA 54% High 55/100
88 94706 Albany CA 54% High 63/100
89 95060 Santa Cruz CA 54% High 48/100
90 95204 Stockton CA 54% High 72/100
91 96038 Grenada CA 54% High 88/100
92 96068 Nubieber CA 54% High 73/100
93 96110 Eagleville CA 54% High 66/100
94 90807 Long Beach CA 53% High 70/100
95 90810 Long Beach CA 53% High 70/100
96 90814 Long Beach CA 53% High 70/100
97 91108 San Marino CA 53% High 76/100
98 91205 Glendale CA 53% High 83/100
99 91330 Northridge CA 53% High 53/100
100 91962 Pine Valley CA 53% High 45/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-07-19.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

How this ranking is calculated, data sources, and limitations: Rankings Methodology →


Related Rankings

Water Safety 2026 EPA violations and water quality scores Lead Risk 2026 Lead pipe infrastructure and EPA exceedances Infrastructure 2026 Aging pipes, system age and remediation costs
Disclaimer: Rankings are based on EPA, FEMA, and federal agency data. They reflect historical patterns and risk indicators, not necessarily current conditions. For the most current information, contact your local water utility or request a Consumer Confidence Report.

Get safety alerts for California

Free updates when EPA data changes for this area. No spam.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy.

Share This Page

X Facebook
Check your water filter options Free tool - no phone call required.