Clasificaciones 2026

Códigos ZIP con el mayor riesgo de terremotos en Washington — 2026

Última actualización: 4 de junio de 2026

732 códigos postales clasificados por Earthquake Risk N.º 1: código postal 98001 (Auburn, 25.2/50) — Relatively High
Plomo Infracciones Puntuación más baja Más seguros Riesgo de inundación Costo de energía Radón PFAS Confiabilidad Índice EJ Riesgo para compradores CO y gas Gas más seguro Carga de remediación Infracciones sin resolver (por proveedor) Equidad del agua (por proveedor)

Out of 732 ZIP codes in Washington with earthquake data, these have the highest seismic risk.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 732
Avg earthquake risk (top 100) 25.2/50

Top 100 ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP City Risk Score Rating Expected Annual Loss
1 98001 Auburn 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
2 98002 Auburn 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
3 98003 Federal Way 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
4 98004 Bellevue 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
5 98005 Bellevue 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
6 98006 Bellevue 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
7 98007 Bellevue 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
8 98008 Bellevue 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
9 98009 Bellevue 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
10 98010 Black Diamond 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
11 98011 Bothell 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
12 98013 Burton 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
13 98014 Carnation 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
14 98015 Bellevue 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
15 98018 King County 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
16 98019 Duvall 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
17 98022 Enumclaw 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
18 98023 Federal Way 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
19 98024 Fall City 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
20 98025 Hobart 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
21 98027 Issaquah 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
22 98028 Kenmore 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
23 98029 Issaquah 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
24 98030 Kent 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
25 98031 Kent 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
26 98032 Kent 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
27 98033 Kirkland 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
28 98034 Kirkland 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
29 98035 Kent 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
30 98038 Maple Valley 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
31 98039 Medina 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
32 98040 Mercer Island 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
33 98041 Bothell 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
34 98042 Kent 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
35 98045 North Bend 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
36 98047 Pacific 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
37 98050 Preston 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
38 98051 Ravensdale 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
39 98052 Redmond 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
40 98053 Redmond 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
41 98055 Renton 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
42 98056 Renton 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
43 98057 Renton 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
44 98058 Renton 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
45 98059 Renton 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
46 98062 Seahurst 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
47 98063 Federal Way 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
48 98064 Kent 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
49 98065 Snoqualmie 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
50 98070 Vashon 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
51 98071 Auburn 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
52 98072 Woodinville 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
53 98073 Redmond 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
54 98074 Sammamish 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
55 98075 Sammamish 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
56 98077 Woodinville 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
57 98083 Kirkland 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
58 98089 Kent 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
59 98092 Auburn 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
60 98093 Federal Way 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
61 98102 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
62 98103 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
63 98104 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
64 98105 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
65 98106 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
66 98107 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
67 98108 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
68 98109 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
69 98111 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
70 98112 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
71 98113 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
72 98114 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
73 98115 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
74 98116 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
75 98117 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
76 98118 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
77 98119 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
78 98121 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
79 98122 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
80 98124 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
81 98125 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
82 98126 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
83 98127 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
84 98129 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
85 98131 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
86 98132 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
87 98133 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
88 98134 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
89 98136 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
90 98138 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
91 98139 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
92 98141 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
93 98144 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
94 98145 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
95 98146 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
96 98148 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
97 98154 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
98 98155 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
99 98158 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M
100 98160 Seattle 25.2/50 Relatively High $220.0M

Explore More

Cómo se calcula esta clasificación, fuentes de datos y limitaciones: Metodología de clasificaciones →

Clasificaciones relacionadas

Seguridad del agua 2026 Infracciones de la EPA y puntuaciones de calidad del agua Riesgo de plomo 2026 Infraestructura de tuberías de plomo y excedencias de la EPA Infraestructura 2026 Tuberías envejecidas, antigüedad del sistema y costos de remediación
Aviso: Las clasificaciones se basan en datos de la EPA, la FEMA y agencias federales. Reflejan patrones históricos e indicadores de riesgo, no necesariamente las condiciones actuales. Para obtener la información más actual, los residentes pueden comunicarse con la compañía local de agua o solicitar un Informe de Confianza del Consumidor (CCR).

Reciba alertas de seguridad para Washington

Actualizaciones gratuitas cuando la EPA publique nuevos datos para esta zona. Sin spam.

Puede cancelar la suscripción en cualquier momento. Política de privacidad.

Compartir esta página

X Facebook
Ver opciones de filtros de agua Herramienta gratuita — sin llamada telefónica requerida.