Private-Well Arsenic Above the EPA Limit by ZIP Code

Data current as of October 2017 — recomputed by ZipCheckup from federal data each build.

The USGS estimates that 2,101,644 people — a 90 percent confidence range of 1,542,173 to 2,879,150 — across 2,906 of 3,113 modeled U.S. counties draw water from private wells with arsenic above the EPA limit of 10 micrograms per liter, as of October 2017. Private wells are not covered by the Safe Drinking Water Act, so no agency is required to test them.

An estimated 2,101,644 people across 2,906 U.S. counties are served by private wells with arsenic above the EPA limit of 10 micrograms per liter — water the Safe Drinking Water Act does not regulate, as of October 2017.

By state

We report two independent facts side by side and do not rank states. A larger count reflects the size of a state's inventory and its reporting activity, not a judgment about water safety.

statewell pop arseniclowhigh
AL2,5901,7523,963
AR1,1518011,698
AZ16,97813,63820,903
CA115,81791,766145,901
CO14,34211,70517,608
CT52,10536,13974,450
DE9,9246,64414,737
FL50,92333,06278,012
GA34,97523,25253,638
IA35,65028,00644,863
ID47,04138,49157,024
IL67,71053,35285,639
IN150,861115,383195,481
KS6,1665,0657,512
KY6,7074,6829,745
LA6,4624,3269,683
MA30,54822,06641,883
MD41,27727,20063,106
ME102,45280,281128,876
MI192,748151,406246,033
MN80,35464,208100,262
MO10,2337,58914,055
MS2,8051,9564,046
MT23,27018,00430,045
NC119,63176,522187,278
ND2,0131,5912,659
NE17,39913,59522,247
NH60,96245,64380,275
NJ40,56326,94960,496
NM30,99024,48638,649
NV21,53417,76725,643
NY66,26547,99092,296
OH189,191118,913294,653
OK4,3403,3915,623
OR26,05520,23233,612
PA80,73052,103126,926
RI1,5091,1451,997
SC28,13318,76642,144
SD1,1819011,661
TN5,2423,4488,099
TX95,45374,592122,291
UT2,1321,5832,818
VA52,79634,58481,000
VT9,7166,98813,363
WA52,24940,17467,401
WI72,66858,72290,435
WV11,5896,30920,662
WY6,2145,0057,759
Download the data

Download CSV Download JSON

Open data, licensed CC BY 4.0 · DOI: 10.5066/F7CN724V

How we compute this

We use the USGS national model of arsenic in private wells (data release DOI 10.5066/F7CN724V, 2017), which estimates, for each county in the conterminous United States, the population served by domestic self-supplied wells whose water exceeds 10 micrograms per liter of arsenic — the federal maximum contaminant level for public water systems. The model is built on arsenic measurements from roughly 20,000 wells (1970 through 2013) and the 2010 domestic-well population.

Because this is a statistical model rather than direct measurement, we report the central estimate alongside its 90 percent confidence range, and we describe it as modeled throughout. The county is the unit of estimate, so figures are summed across counties and never across ZIP codes, and no population is counted twice.

Counties the model leaves unestimated — Alaska, Hawaii, and the territories lie outside the conterminous study area — are omitted, never counted as zero. Each county estimate maps to the ZIP codes within it, and figures recompute on every build.

Source: USGS — Arsenic in private domestic wells, conterminous U.S. (county model, 2017)
Every number here is recomputed from public federal data on each build by open-source code in the ZipCheckup repository; a dated CSV snapshot is published with each finding. No data does not mean safe.

Frequently asked questions

How many Americans drink from private wells with arsenic above the federal limit?

The USGS estimates 2,101,644 people — with a 90 percent confidence range of 1,542,173 to 2,879,150 — across 2,906 U.S. counties are served by private wells whose water exceeds the EPA arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter, as of October 2017. This is a modeled national estimate, not a direct measurement. according to ZipCheckup's reading of federal data as of October 2017.

Does the EPA test private well water for arsenic?

No. The Safe Drinking Water Act regulates public water systems, not private household wells, so no federal or state agency is required to test or treat private-well water. Owners of private wells are responsible for their own testing. The USGS arsenic model reported here, as of October 2017, is a way to gauge the scale of likely exposure where direct testing is absent.