Out of 254 ZIP codes in Nevada with earthquake data, these have the highest seismic risk.
| Statistic |
Value |
| ZIP codes ranked |
254 |
| Avg earthquake risk (top 100) |
36.7/50 |
Top 100 ZIP Codes
| Rank |
ZIP |
City |
Risk Score |
Rating |
Expected Annual Loss |
| 1 |
88901 |
The Lakes |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 2 |
88905 |
The Lakes |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 3 |
89002 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 4 |
89004 |
Blue Diamond |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 5 |
89005 |
Boulder City |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 6 |
89006 |
Boulder City |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 7 |
89007 |
Bunkerville |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 8 |
89009 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 9 |
89011 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 10 |
89012 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 11 |
89014 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 12 |
89015 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 13 |
89016 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 14 |
89018 |
Indian Springs |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 15 |
89019 |
Jean |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 16 |
89021 |
Logandale |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 17 |
89024 |
Mesquite |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 18 |
89025 |
Moapa |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 19 |
89026 |
Jean |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 20 |
89027 |
Mesquite |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 21 |
89028 |
Laughlin |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 22 |
89029 |
Laughlin |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 23 |
89030 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 24 |
89031 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 25 |
89032 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 26 |
89033 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 27 |
89034 |
Mesquite |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 28 |
89036 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 29 |
89037 |
Coyote Springs |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 30 |
89039 |
Cal Nev Ari |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 31 |
89040 |
Overton |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 32 |
89044 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 33 |
89046 |
Searchlight |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 34 |
89052 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 35 |
89053 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 36 |
89054 |
Sloan |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 37 |
89067 |
Coyote Springs |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 38 |
89070 |
Indian Springs |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 39 |
89074 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 40 |
89077 |
Henderson |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 41 |
89081 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 42 |
89084 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 43 |
89085 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 44 |
89086 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 45 |
89087 |
North Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 46 |
89101 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 47 |
89102 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 48 |
89103 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 49 |
89104 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 50 |
89105 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 51 |
89106 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 52 |
89107 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 53 |
89108 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 54 |
89109 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 55 |
89110 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 56 |
89111 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 57 |
89112 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 58 |
89113 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 59 |
89114 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 60 |
89115 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 61 |
89116 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 62 |
89117 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 63 |
89118 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 64 |
89119 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 65 |
89120 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 66 |
89121 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 67 |
89122 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 68 |
89123 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 69 |
89124 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 70 |
89125 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 71 |
89126 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 72 |
89127 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 73 |
89128 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 74 |
89129 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 75 |
89130 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 76 |
89131 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 77 |
89132 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 78 |
89133 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 79 |
89134 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 80 |
89135 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 81 |
89136 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 82 |
89137 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 83 |
89138 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 84 |
89139 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 85 |
89140 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 86 |
89141 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 87 |
89142 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 88 |
89143 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 89 |
89144 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 90 |
89145 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 91 |
89146 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 92 |
89147 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 93 |
89148 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 94 |
89149 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 95 |
89150 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 96 |
89151 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 97 |
89152 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 98 |
89153 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 99 |
89154 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
| 100 |
89155 |
Las Vegas |
36.7/50 |
Relatively High |
$48.6M |
Explore More