Clasificaciones 2026

Peor infraestructura: Detroit Área metropolitana — 2026

Última actualización: 31 de agosto de 2026

45 códigos postales clasificados por Pipe Failure Risk N.º 1: código postal 48088 (Warren, MI) - NaN%

Out of 45 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in the Detroit metro area, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 45
Highest risk NaN%
Median risk NaN%
Average risk NaN%

Top 45 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 48088 Warren MI NaN% Unknown 100/100
2 48089 Warren MI NaN% Unknown 100/100
3 48091 Warren MI NaN% Unknown 100/100
4 48092 Warren MI NaN% Unknown 100/100
5 48093 Warren MI NaN% Unknown 100/100
6 48103 Ann Arbor MI NaN% Unknown 62/100
7 48104 Ann Arbor MI NaN% Unknown 67/100
8 48105 Ann Arbor MI NaN% Unknown 62/100
9 48108 Ann Arbor MI NaN% Unknown 65/100
10 48109 Ann Arbor MI NaN% Unknown 67/100
11 48120 Dearborn MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
12 48124 Dearborn MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
13 48125 Dearborn Heights MI NaN% Unknown 82/100
14 48126 Dearborn MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
15 48127 Dearborn Heights MI NaN% Unknown 81/100
16 48128 Dearborn MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
17 48201 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
18 48202 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
19 48204 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
20 48205 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 90/100
21 48206 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
22 48207 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
23 48208 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown
24 48209 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
25 48210 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
26 48211 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 87/100
27 48213 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
28 48214 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
29 48215 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
30 48216 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
31 48217 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
32 48219 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 89/100
33 48221 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
34 48223 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 90/100
35 48224 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 90/100
36 48226 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
37 48227 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
38 48228 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
39 48234 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
40 48235 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
41 48238 Detroit MI NaN% Unknown 92/100
42 48310 Sterling Heights MI NaN% Unknown 100/100
43 48312 Sterling Heights MI NaN% Unknown 99/100
44 48313 Sterling Heights MI NaN% Unknown 99/100
45 48314 Sterling Heights MI NaN% Unknown 100/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-08-31.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

Cómo se calcula esta clasificación, fuentes de datos y limitaciones: Metodología de clasificaciones →


Clasificaciones relacionadas

Seguridad del agua 2026 Infracciones de la EPA y puntuaciones de calidad del agua Riesgo de plomo 2026 Infraestructura de tuberías de plomo y excedencias de la EPA Infraestructura 2026 Tuberías envejecidas, antigüedad del sistema y costos de remediación
Aviso: Las clasificaciones se basan en datos de la EPA, la FEMA y agencias federales. Reflejan patrones históricos e indicadores de riesgo, no necesariamente las condiciones actuales. Para obtener la información más actual, los residentes pueden comunicarse con la compañía local de agua o solicitar un Informe de Confianza del Consumidor (CCR).

Reciba alertas de seguridad

Actualizaciones gratuitas cuando la EPA publique nuevos datos para esta zona. Sin spam.

Puede cancelar la suscripción en cualquier momento. Política de privacidad.

Compartir esta página

X Facebook
Ver opciones de filtros de agua Herramienta gratuita - sin llamada telefónica requerida.