Clasificaciones 2026

Peor infraestructura: New York — Clasificaciones 2026

Última actualización: 4 de junio de 2026

2,050 códigos postales clasificados por Pipe Failure Risk N.º 1: código postal 12202 (Albany, NY) — 76%

Out of 2,050 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in New York, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 2,050
Highest risk 76%
Median risk 47%
Average risk 48%
State New York

Top 100 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 12202 Albany NY 76% Very High 31/100
2 12209 Albany NY 76% Very High 31/100
3 12206 Albany NY 75% Very High 19/100
4 12210 Albany NY 75% Very High 31/100
5 11204 Brooklyn NY 74% Very High 62/100
6 11209 Brooklyn NY 74% Very High 57/100
7 11215 Brooklyn NY 74% Very High 57/100
8 11220 Brooklyn NY 74% Very High 62/100
9 11225 Brooklyn NY 74% Very High 67/100
10 11226 Brooklyn NY 74% Very High 62/100
11 11228 Brooklyn NY 74% Very High 57/100
12 11210 Brooklyn NY 73% Very High 62/100
13 11213 Brooklyn NY 73% Very High 67/100
14 12010 Amsterdam NY 73% Very High 30/100
15 11203 Brooklyn NY 72% Very High 62/100
16 11216 Brooklyn NY 72% Very High 67/100
17 11223 Brooklyn NY 72% Very High 57/100
18 11229 Brooklyn NY 72% Very High 52/100
19 11230 Brooklyn NY 72% Very High 62/100
20 13138 Pompey NY 72% Very High 54/100
21 13208 Syracuse NY 72% Very High 43/100
22 11214 Brooklyn NY 71% Very High 57/100
23 11218 Brooklyn NY 71% Very High 62/100
24 11219 Brooklyn NY 71% Very High 57/100
25 11231 Brooklyn NY 71% Very High 52/100
26 11232 Brooklyn NY 71% Very High 57/100
27 11237 Brooklyn NY 71% Very High 62/100
28 12208 Albany NY 71% Very High 26/100
29 13204 Syracuse NY 71% Very High 38/100
30 13207 Syracuse NY 71% Very High 43/100
31 11233 Brooklyn NY 70% Very High 62/100
32 11234 Brooklyn NY 70% Very High 52/100
33 12203 Albany NY 70% Very High 26/100
34 12222 Albany NY 70% Very High 19/100
35 11221 Brooklyn NY 69% Very High 67/100
36 11222 Brooklyn NY 69% Very High 57/100
37 11236 Brooklyn NY 69% Very High 52/100
38 11238 Brooklyn NY 69% Very High 62/100
39 13203 Syracuse NY 69% Very High 43/100
40 13205 Syracuse NY 69% Very High 43/100
41 13206 Syracuse NY 69% Very High 38/100
42 13350 Herkimer NY 69% Very High 40/100
43 10033 New York NY 68% Very High 68/100
44 11207 Brooklyn NY 68% Very High 62/100
45 11208 Brooklyn NY 68% Very High 62/100
46 11212 Brooklyn NY 68% Very High 67/100
47 11217 Brooklyn NY 68% Very High 62/100
48 11235 Brooklyn NY 68% Very High 47/100
49 12204 Albany NY 68% Very High 31/100
50 12205 Albany NY 68% Very High 26/100
51 12207 Albany NY 68% Very High 26/100
52 13211 Syracuse NY 68% Very High 43/100
53 13224 Syracuse NY 68% Very High 38/100
54 10024 New York NY 67% Very High 76/100
55 10031 New York NY 67% Very High 81/100
56 10034 New York NY 67% Very High 76/100
57 11205 Brooklyn NY 67% Very High 67/100
58 12211 Albany NY 67% Very High 31/100
59 12884 Victory Mills NY 67% Very High 71/100
60 13214 Syracuse NY 67% Very High 38/100
61 13601 Watertown NY 67% Very High 50/100
62 10014 New York NY 66% Very High 71/100
63 10032 New York NY 66% Very High 56/100
64 10040 New York NY 66% Very High 81/100
65 13210 Syracuse NY 66% Very High 43/100
66 13314 Brookfield NY 66% Very High 64/100
67 13501 Utica NY 66% Very High 58/100
68 14619 Rochester NY 66% Very High 73/100
69 10012 New York NY 65% Very High 76/100
70 10025 New York NY 65% Very High 76/100
71 10595 Valhalla NY 65% Very High 58/100
72 11211 Brooklyn NY 65% Very High 57/100
73 11224 Brooklyn NY 65% Very High 47/100
74 12986 Tupper Lake NY 65% Very High 70/100
75 13202 Syracuse NY 65% Very High 43/100
76 13209 Syracuse NY 65% Very High 43/100
77 13219 Syracuse NY 65% Very High 38/100
78 13776 Gilbertsville NY 65% Very High 65/100
79 10003 New York NY 64% Very High 76/100
80 10006 New York NY 64% Very High 76/100
81 10009 New York NY 64% Very High 71/100
82 13212 Syracuse NY 64% Very High 43/100
83 10013 New York NY 63% Very High 71/100
84 10027 New York NY 63% Very High 73/100
85 10560 North Salem NY 63% Very High 65/100
86 10960 Nyack NY 63% Very High 58/100
87 11201 Brooklyn NY 63% Very High 62/100
88 12043 Cobleskill NY 63% Very High 40/100
89 12308 Schenectady NY 63% Very High 80/100
90 12401 Kingston NY 63% Very High 25/100
91 12414 Catskill NY 63% Very High 43/100
92 13502 Utica NY 63% Very High 58/100
93 13802 Maine NY 63% Very High 62/100
94 13846 Treadwell NY 63% Very High 56/100
95 14456 Geneva NY 63% Very High 60/100
96 14607 Rochester NY 63% Very High 73/100
97 14611 Rochester NY 63% Very High 73/100
98 10002 New York NY 62% Very High 76/100
99 10011 New York NY 62% Very High 71/100
100 10028 New York NY 62% Very High 76/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-06-04.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

Cómo se calcula esta clasificación, fuentes de datos y limitaciones: Metodología de clasificaciones →


Clasificaciones relacionadas

Seguridad del agua 2026 Infracciones de la EPA y puntuaciones de calidad del agua Riesgo de plomo 2026 Infraestructura de tuberías de plomo y excedencias de la EPA Infraestructura 2026 Tuberías envejecidas, antigüedad del sistema y costos de remediación
Aviso: Las clasificaciones se basan en datos de la EPA, la FEMA y agencias federales. Reflejan patrones históricos e indicadores de riesgo, no necesariamente las condiciones actuales. Para obtener la información más actual, los residentes pueden comunicarse con la compañía local de agua o solicitar un Informe de Confianza del Consumidor (CCR).

Reciba alertas de seguridad para New York

Actualizaciones gratuitas cuando la EPA publique nuevos datos para esta zona. Sin spam.

Puede cancelar la suscripción en cualquier momento. Política de privacidad.

Compartir esta página

X Facebook
Ver opciones de filtros de agua Herramienta gratuita — sin llamada telefónica requerida.