Clasificaciones 2026

Peor infraestructura: Florida — Clasificaciones 2026

Última actualización: 19 de julio de 2026

1,426 códigos postales clasificados por Pipe Failure Risk N.º 1: código postal 33530 (Durant, FL) - 69%

Out of 1,426 ZIP codes with infrastructure data in Florida, these areas face the highest estimated risk of water pipe failure based on infrastructure age, funding gaps, and violation history.

Statistic Value
ZIP codes ranked 1,426
Highest risk 69%
Median risk 27%
Average risk 28%
State Florida

Top 100 Highest Risk ZIP Codes

Rank ZIP Code City State Pipe Failure Risk Risk Level Safety Score
1 33530 Durant FL 69% Very High 82/100
2 32323 Lanark Village FL 58% High 65/100
3 32634 Fairfield FL 57% High 63/100
4 33877 Waverly FL 54% High 63/100
5 32178 Palatka FL 53% High 66/100
6 34267 Fort Ogden FL 53% High 50/100
7 34762 Okahumpka FL 51% High 66/100
8 32530 Bagdad FL 49% High 73/100
9 33405 West Palm Beach FL 49% High 79/100
10 33460 Lake Worth FL 49% High 83/100
11 33704 Saint Petersburg FL 49% High 40/100
12 32357 Shady Grove FL 48% High 66/100
13 33713 Saint Petersburg FL 48% High 55/100
14 32112 Crescent City FL 47% High 60/100
15 32177 Palatka FL 47% High 60/100
16 33480 Palm Beach FL 47% High 71/100
17 32347 Perry FL 46% High 60/100
18 33135 Miami FL 46% High 59/100
19 33168 Miami FL 46% High 54/100
20 33438 Canal Point FL 46% High 73/100
21 33705 Saint Petersburg FL 46% High 40/100
22 33710 Saint Petersburg FL 46% High 45/100
23 33857 Lorida FL 46% High 72/100
24 34265 Arcadia FL 46% High 89/100
25 32079 Penney Farms FL 45% High 87/100
26 32139 Georgetown FL 45% High 79/100
27 32320 Apalachicola FL 45% High 68/100
28 32501 Pensacola FL 45% High 66/100
29 33144 Miami FL 45% High 54/100
30 33145 Miami FL 45% High 59/100
31 33709 Saint Petersburg FL 45% High 45/100
32 33843 Frostproof FL 45% High 62/100
33 32804 Orlando FL 44% High 75/100
34 33013 Hialeah FL 44% High 54/100
35 33020 Hollywood FL 44% High 61/100
36 33023 Hollywood FL 44% High 61/100
37 33142 Miami FL 44% High 54/100
38 33147 Miami FL 44% High 54/100
39 33150 Miami FL 44% High 54/100
40 33161 Miami FL 44% High 49/100
41 33162 Miami FL 44% High 54/100
42 33702 Saint Petersburg FL 44% High 40/100
43 33707 Saint Petersburg FL 44% High 40/100
44 33711 Saint Petersburg FL 44% High 45/100
45 33712 Saint Petersburg FL 44% High 50/100
46 33714 Saint Petersburg FL 44% High 50/100
47 34239 Sarasota FL 44% High 77/100
48 34950 Fort Pierce FL 44% High 73/100
49 32064 Live Oak FL 43% High 81/100
50 32118 Daytona Beach FL 43% High 76/100
51 32330 Greensboro FL 43% High 95/100
52 32701 Altamonte Springs FL 43% High 77/100
53 32803 Orlando FL 43% High 80/100
54 33125 Miami FL 43% High 54/100
55 33127 Miami FL 43% High 64/100
56 33134 Miami FL 43% High 59/100
57 33155 Miami FL 43% High 54/100
58 33165 Miami FL 43% High 54/100
59 33514 Center Hill FL 43% High 95/100
60 33703 Saint Petersburg FL 43% High 40/100
61 33881 Winter Haven FL 43% High 71/100
62 34205 Bradenton FL 43% High 76/100
63 34498 Yankeetown FL 43% High 76/100
64 34946 Fort Pierce FL 43% High 73/100
65 32114 Daytona Beach FL 42% High 71/100
66 32205 Jacksonville FL 42% High 70/100
67 32332 Gretna FL 42% High 87/100
68 32401 Panama City FL 42% High 76/100
69 32503 Pensacola FL 42% High 66/100
70 33010 Hialeah FL 42% High 54/100
71 33012 Hialeah FL 42% High 49/100
72 33021 Hollywood FL 42% High 66/100
73 33054 Opa Locka FL 42% High 54/100
74 33138 Miami FL 42% High 54/100
75 33167 Miami FL 42% High 54/100
76 33181 Miami FL 42% High 54/100
77 33313 Fort Lauderdale FL 42% High 49/100
78 33476 Pahokee FL 42% High 66/100
79 34207 Bradenton FL 42% High 76/100
80 34266 Arcadia FL 42% High 71/100
81 34690 Holiday FL 42% High 76/100
82 34739 Kenansville FL 42% High 81/100
83 34958 Jensen Beach FL 42% High 87/100
84 34996 Stuart FL 42% High 66/100
85 32206 Jacksonville FL 41% High 80/100
86 32254 Jacksonville FL 41% High 75/100
87 32715 Altamonte Springs FL 41% High 89/100
88 32716 Altamonte Springs FL 41% High 89/100
89 33019 Hollywood FL 41% High 61/100
90 33166 Miami FL 41% High 49/100
91 33169 Miami FL 41% High 54/100
92 33311 Fort Lauderdale FL 41% High 49/100
93 33407 West Palm Beach FL 41% High 79/100
94 33462 Lake Worth FL 41% High 78/100
95 33513 Bushnell FL 41% High 66/100
96 33701 Saint Petersburg FL 41% High 45/100
97 33777 Seminole FL 41% High 45/100
98 33825 Avon Park FL 41% High 67/100
99 33840 Eaton Park FL 41% High 79/100
100 33880 Winter Haven FL 41% High 66/100

Methodology

Infrastructure risk rankings combine four data sources, each weighted equally (25%): (1) EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey (DWINS 2023) — state-level 20-year funding gap per capita for pipe replacement, treatment, and storage; (2) Census ACS housing vintage — percentage of homes built before 1980, when lead solder and galvanized pipes were common; (3) EPA SDWIS violation and enforcement data — system-level compliance history; (4) Lead and Copper Rule indicators — service line material inventories and 90th percentile lead testing results. The combined score is normalized to a 0-100% probability scale.

Data sources: EPA DWINS 2023, Census ACS, EPA SDWIS, Lead and Copper Rule data. Last updated: 2026-07-19.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does pipe failure probability mean?

Pipe failure probability estimates the likelihood of water main breaks, lead contamination from corroded pipes, or service disruptions based on infrastructure age, state funding gaps, violation history, and lead indicators. It is not a prediction of imminent failure, but a risk assessment based on known factors.

How is infrastructure risk calculated?

The risk score combines four equally weighted factors: state-level infrastructure funding gap per capita (from EPA DWINS 2023), housing vintage (Census ACS pre-1980 housing percentage), water system violation and enforcement history (EPA SDWIS), and lead exposure indicators (service line probability and testing results).

What can homeowners do about aging infrastructure?

Test your tap water annually, especially for lead. Check if your home has a lead service line through your water utility. Consider a whole-house water filter (NSF/ANSI 53 certified). Review your water system Consumer Confidence Report for violation history.

Does high risk mean my water is unsafe right now?

Not necessarily. Infrastructure risk indicates long-term vulnerability, not current contamination. However, areas with aging pipes and high violation counts have a statistically higher chance of water quality issues. Regular testing is the best way to verify your water safety.

Explore More Rankings

Cómo se calcula esta clasificación, fuentes de datos y limitaciones: Metodología de clasificaciones →


Clasificaciones relacionadas

Seguridad del agua 2026 Infracciones de la EPA y puntuaciones de calidad del agua Riesgo de plomo 2026 Infraestructura de tuberías de plomo y excedencias de la EPA Infraestructura 2026 Tuberías envejecidas, antigüedad del sistema y costos de remediación
Aviso: Las clasificaciones se basan en datos de la EPA, la FEMA y agencias federales. Reflejan patrones históricos e indicadores de riesgo, no necesariamente las condiciones actuales. Para obtener la información más actual, los residentes pueden comunicarse con la compañía local de agua o solicitar un Informe de Confianza del Consumidor (CCR).

Reciba alertas de seguridad para Florida

Actualizaciones gratuitas cuando la EPA publique nuevos datos para esta zona. Sin spam.

Puede cancelar la suscripción en cualquier momento. Política de privacidad.

Compartir esta página

X Facebook
Ver opciones de filtros de agua Herramienta gratuita - sin llamada telefónica requerida.